These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24315606)

  • 1. Evaluation of tapelifting as a collection method for touch DNA.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 24315606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary investigation of differential tapelifting for sampling forensically relevant layered deposits.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Nov; 17(6):553-9. PubMed ID: 26152832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Touch DNA sampling with SceneSafe Fast™ minitapes.
    Stoop B; Defaux PM; Utz S; Zieger M
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2017 Nov; 29():68-71. PubMed ID: 29102833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increased recovery of touch DNA evidence using FTA paper compared to conventional collection methods.
    Kirgiz IA; Calloway C
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Apr; 47():9-15. PubMed ID: 28171796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Recovery of blood traces with scenesafe FAST tape].
    Keller E; Looser M; Bieri HP; Kübler E; Balitzki B
    Arch Kriminol; 2012; 230(5-6):166-76. PubMed ID: 23367791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of adhesive tape for recovery of DNA from crime scene items.
    Barash M; Reshef A; Brauner P
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jul; 55(4):1058-64. PubMed ID: 20456579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-throughput DNA extraction of forensic adhesive tapes.
    Forsberg C; Jansson L; Ansell R; Hedman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():158-163. PubMed ID: 27448236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The utility of polyester and cotton as swabbing substrates for the removal of cellular material from surfaces.
    Mulligan CM; Kaufman SR; Quarino L
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Mar; 56(2):485-90. PubMed ID: 21342191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Getting blood from a stone": ultrasensitive forensic DNA profiling of microscopic bio-particles recovered from "touch DNA" evidence.
    Hanson EK; Ballantyne J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1039():3-17. PubMed ID: 24026682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Collection of Samples for DNA Analysis.
    van Oorschot RA; Verdon TJ; Ballantyne KN
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1420():1-12. PubMed ID: 27259727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
    Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of contact force on forensic trace collection efficiency when sampling textiles with adhesive tape.
    Damsteeg-van Berkel S; Beemster F; Dankelman J; Loeve AJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 May; 298():278-283. PubMed ID: 30925346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recovery of Trace DNA on Clothing: A Comparison of Mini-tape Lifting and Three Other Forensic Evidence Collection Techniques.
    Hess S; Haas C
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):187-191. PubMed ID: 27864934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The DNA-Buster: The evaluation of an alternative DNA recovery approach.
    Währer J; Kehm S; Allen M; Brauer L; Eidam O; Seiberle I; Kron S; Scheurer E; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 May; 64():102830. PubMed ID: 36702080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Touch DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridges: Comparison of swabbing, tape lifting and soaking.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jan; 330():111101. PubMed ID: 34801815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic study for DNA recovery and profiling from common IED substrates: From laboratory to casework.
    Phetpeng S; Kitpipit T; Thanakiatkrai P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():53-60. PubMed ID: 25828367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridge cases: A comparison of swabbing, tape lifting, vacuum filtration, and direct PCR.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; Gunn P; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110507. PubMed ID: 32977300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrostatic sampling of trace DNA from clothing.
    Zieger M; Defaux PM; Utz S
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):661-7. PubMed ID: 26753871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.