These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24315880)

  • 1. An in vitro study into the accuracy of a novel method for recording the mandibular transverse horizontal axis.
    Keeling AJ; Brunton PA; Holt RJ
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 24315880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimated and true hinge axis: a comparison of condylar displacements.
    Wood DP; Korne PH
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(3):167-75; discussion 176. PubMed ID: 1416235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining the accuracy of articulator interchangeability and hinge axis reproducibility.
    Hatzi P; Millstein P; Maya A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 11264930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E; Otegi JR; Goicoechea N; Brizuela A; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 25858220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative tests of arbitrary and kinematic transverse horizontal axis recordings of mandibular movements.
    Bernhardt O; Küppers N; Rosin M; Meyer G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 12616238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Occlusal errors generated at the maxillary incisal edge position related to discrepancies in the arbitrary horizontal axis location and to the thickness of the interocclusal record.
    Kois JC; Kois DE; Chaiyabutr Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 23998625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Mínguez R; Barrenetxea L; Otegi JR; Szentpétery A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 25557006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: a prospective study. Part 1.
    Cordray FE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):619-30. PubMed ID: 16679202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Movement between centric relation contact position and the intercuspal position.
    Wise MD
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 1520455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Method and accuracy of determining the jaw position of repositioning splint with the aid of digital technique].
    Fang SB; Yang GJ; Kang YF; Sun YC; Xie QF
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 33550339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative analysis of edentulous patients treated traditionally and with the use of a face-bow and Quick Master articulator].
    Kubrak J
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1998; 44():237-49. PubMed ID: 9857542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reproducibility of condylar hinge axis positions in patients, by different operators, using the electronic mandibular position indicator.
    Tuppy F; Celar RM; Celar AG; Piehslinger E; Jäger W
    J Orofac Pain; 1994; 8(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 7812230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal Use of Physical Centric Relation Records for Digital Workflows.
    Osnes C; Patel J; Wagstaff A; Ferrari M; Keeling A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 Nov; 29(4):223-229. PubMed ID: 34218536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Helical axis errors affect computer-generated occlusal contacts.
    DeLong R; Ko CC; Olson I; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Dent Res; 2002 May; 81(5):338-43. PubMed ID: 12097448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of face-bow transfer for the planning of orthognathic surgery.
    Zizelmann C; Hammer B; Gellrich NC; Schwestka-Polly R; Rana M; Bucher P
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1944-50. PubMed ID: 22079061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the replicability of routinely used centric relation registration techniques.
    Keshvad A; Winstanley RB
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):90-101. PubMed ID: 12964681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 1 face bow.
    Walker F; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Barbenel J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):567-72. PubMed ID: 18462852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of arbitrary and mean transfer of dental casts to the articulator on centric occlusal errors.
    Morneburg TR; Pröschel PA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Jun; 15(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 20336474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.