These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1003 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24316118)

  • 1. Obese Class III patients at significantly greater risk of multiple complications after lumbar surgery: an analysis of 10,387 patients in the ACS NSQIP database.
    Buerba RA; Fu MC; Gruskay JA; Long WD; Grauer JN
    Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2008-18. PubMed ID: 24316118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anterior and posterior cervical fusion in patients with high body mass index are not associated with greater complications.
    Buerba RA; Fu MC; Grauer JN
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1643-53. PubMed ID: 24388595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of obesity on complications and outcomes: a comparison of fusion and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery.
    Onyekwelu I; Glassman SD; Asher AL; Shaffrey CI; Mummaneni PV; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 27740396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Approach-based Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.
    Katz AD; Mancini N; Karukonda T; Greenwood M; Cote M; Moss IL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(6):432-441. PubMed ID: 30138253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increased risk of postoperative wound complications among obesity classes II & III after ALIF in 10-year ACS-NSQIP analysis of 10,934 cases.
    Miller EM; McAllister BD
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):587-594. PubMed ID: 34813958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increased risk of complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the elderly: an analysis of 6253 patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
    Buerba RA; Giles E; Webb ML; Fu MC; Gvozdyev B; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Dec; 39(25):2062-9. PubMed ID: 25271519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outpatient surgery reduces short-term complications in lumbar discectomy: an analysis of 4310 patients from the ACS-NSQIP database.
    Pugely AJ; Martin CT; Gao Y; Mendoza-Lattes SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 22814304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-day Complications After Spine Surgery?
    McCarthy MH; Singh P; Nayak R; Maslak JP; Jenkins TJ; Patel AA; Hsu WK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):621-628. PubMed ID: 31770319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal Trends of Patient Demographics and Morbidity of Different Approaches in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Oezel L; Okano I; Hughes AP; Sarin M; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Soffin EM
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e183-e193. PubMed ID: 35472646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients.
    Lau D; Khan A; Terman SW; Yee T; La Marca F; Park P
    Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Aug; 35(2):E10. PubMed ID: 23905948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the lumbar disc herniation patients randomized in SPORT to 6,846 discectomy patients from NSQIP: demographics, perioperative variables, and complications correlate well.
    Golinvaux NS; Bohl DD; Basques BA; Yacob A; Grauer JN
    Spine J; 2015 Apr; 15(4):685-91. PubMed ID: 25499208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Obesity does not impact clinical outcome but affects cervical sagittal alignment and adjacent segment degeneration in short term follow-up after an anterior cervical decompression and fusion.
    Basques BA; Khan JM; Louie PK; Mormol J; Heidt S; Varthi A; Paul JC; Goldberg EJ; An HS
    Spine J; 2019 Jul; 19(7):1146-1153. PubMed ID: 30914278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hospital charges associated with "never events": comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and lumbar laminectomy to total joint arthroplasty.
    Daniels AH; Kawaguchi S; Contag AG; Rastegar F; Waagmeester G; Anderson PA; Arthur M; Hart RA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 26989978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Body mass index as a predictor of complications and mortality after lumbar spine surgery.
    Marquez-Lara A; Nandyala SV; Sankaranarayanan S; Noureldin M; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):798-804. PubMed ID: 24480950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
    Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Obesity Is an Independent Risk Factor of Early Complications After Revision Spine Surgery.
    Sing DC; Yue JK; Metz LN; Winkler EA; Zhang WR; Burch S; Berven SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 May; 41(10):E632-40. PubMed ID: 26641848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Impact of Obesity on Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Elective Posterior Lumbar Spine Fusion.
    Jain D; Durand W; Shaw JD; Burch S; Deviren V; Berven S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Apr; 46(7):457-463. PubMed ID: 33181774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Establishing benchmarks for the volume-outcome relationship for common lumbar spine surgical procedures.
    Schoenfeld AJ; Sturgeon DJ; Burns CB; Hunt TJ; Bono CM
    Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 28887272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary and Revision Posterior Lumbar Fusion Have Similar Short-Term Complication Rates.
    Basques BA; Diaz-Collado PJ; Geddes BJ; Samuel AM; Lukasiewicz AM; Webb ML; Bohl DD; Ahn J; Singh K; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E101-6. PubMed ID: 26539938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 51.