These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24316898)
21. A surge in anti-dsDNA titer predicts a severe lupus flare within six months. Pan N; Amigues I; Lyman S; Duculan R; Aziz F; Crow MK; Kirou KA Lupus; 2014 Mar; 23(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 24316605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Antibodies to native DNA in connective tissue disease. A comparison of radioimmunoassay, counterimmunoelectrophoresis and indirect immunofluorescence on Crithidia luciliae substrate. Hodinka L; Merétey K; Jancsó A; Falus A; Korda J; Bozsóky S Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 1979; 27(5):641-6. PubMed ID: 398205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of the LIAISON ANA screen assay for antinuclear antibody testing in autoimmune diseases. Ghillani P; Rouquette AM; Desgruelles C; Hauguel N; Le Pendeven C; Piette JC; Musset L Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Aug; 1109():407-13. PubMed ID: 17785329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Anti-chromatin and anti-C1q antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus compared to other systemic autoimmune diseases. Braun A; Sis J; Max R; Mueller K; Fiehn C; Zeier M; Andrassy K Scand J Rheumatol; 2007; 36(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 17763207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. High sensitive detection of double-stranded DNA autoantibodies by a modified Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test. Conrad K; Ittenson A; Reinhold D; Fischer R; Roggenbuck D; Büttner T; Bosselmann HP; Steinbach J; Schössler W Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Sep; 1173():180-5. PubMed ID: 19758148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is closer linkage between systemic lupus erythematosus and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies a desirable and attainable goal? Nossent HC; Rekvig OP Arthritis Res Ther; 2005; 7(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 15743494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of the routine implementation of automated indirect immunofluorescence antinuclear antibody analysis: 1 year of experience. Mulliez SM; Maenhout TM; Bonroy C Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Jul; 54(7):e183-6. PubMed ID: 26562038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Low diagnostic and predictive value of anti-dsDNA antibodies in unselected patients with recent onset of rheumatic symptoms: results from a long-term follow-up Scandinavian multicentre study. Compagno M; Jacobsen S; Rekvig OP; Truedsson L; Heegaard NH; Nossent J; Jönsen A; Jacobsen RS; Eilertsen GØ; Sturfelt G; Bengtsson AA Scand J Rheumatol; 2013; 42(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 23496224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reconstructing a 3-dimensional image of the results of antinuclear antibody testing by indirect immunofluorescence. Murai R; Yamada K; Tanaka M; Kuribayashi K; Kobayashi D; Tsuji N; Watanabe N J Immunol Methods; 2013 Jan; 387(1-2):312-6. PubMed ID: 23073364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Antibodies to guanosine triphosphate misidentified as anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies in a patient with antinuclear antibody-negative lupus, due to buckling of insolubilized assay DNA. Ma CH; Hui J; Tang JT; Leung DT; Chui YL; Fok TF; Lim PL Arthritis Rheum; 2004 May; 50(5):1533-8. PubMed ID: 15146423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multiplexed AtheNA multi-lyte immunoassay for ANA screening in autoimmune diseases. Shovman O; Gilburd B; Zandman-Goddard G; Yehiely A; Langevitz P; Shoenfeld Y Autoimmunity; 2005 Feb; 38(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 15804711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: different clinical and serological pattern than adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Hoffman IE; Lauwerys BR; De Keyser F; Huizinga TW; Isenberg D; Cebecauer L; Dehoorne J; Joos R; Hendrickx G; Houssiau F; Elewaut D Ann Rheum Dis; 2009 Mar; 68(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 18930995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Determination of anti dsDNA antibodies by immunofluorescence using Crithidia luciliae. I--Diagnostic and prognostic value in systemic lupus erythematosus. Comparison with the Farr radioimmunoassay]. Borda-Iriarte O; Meyer O; Cyna J; Haïm T; Ryckewaert A Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic; 1984 Apr; 51(4):185-91. PubMed ID: 6374861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of antinuclear antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence and line immunoassay methods': four years' data from Turkey. Sener AG; Afsar I; Demirci M APMIS; 2014 Dec; 122(12):1167-70. PubMed ID: 24735346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparison of the methods used for the detection of antinuclear antibodies]. Berkem R; Gümüş T; Karakoç E; Acar N Mikrobiyol Bul; 2003; 37(2-3):171-8. PubMed ID: 14593900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparative study on the reliability of an automated system for the evaluation of cell-based indirect immunofluorescence. Melegari A; Bonaguri C; Russo A; Luisita B; Trenti T; Lippi G Autoimmun Rev; 2012 Aug; 11(10):713-6. PubMed ID: 22269861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Comparison of indirect immunofluorescence on Crithidia luciliae of Farr test, and immunoenzymatic methods for the screening of anti-native DNA autoantibodies]. Chrétien P; Dauvin M; Hélin P; Ocwieja T; Absalon YB; Johanet C Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1994; 52(9):645-50. PubMed ID: 7872513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multiplex assessment of non-organ-specific autoantibodies with a novel microbead-based immunoassay. Grossmann K; Roggenbuck D; Schröder C; Conrad K; Schierack P; Sack U Cytometry A; 2011 Feb; 79(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 21265005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The anti-dsDNA antibodies: validation of an original two step strategy of detection]. Lemarié R; Jacomet F; Goutte B; Bonnafoux C; Tridon A; Evrard B Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2011; 69(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 21463995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]