312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24316943)
1. Accuracy of preoperative MRI in predicting pathology stage in rectal cancers: node-for-node matched histopathology validation of MRI features.
Park JS; Jang YJ; Choi GS; Park SY; Kim HJ; Kang H; Cho SH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Jan; 57(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 24316943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer.
Lambregts DM; Beets GL; Maas M; Kessels AG; Bakers FC; Cappendijk VC; Engelen SM; Lahaye MJ; de Bruïne AP; Lammering G; Leiner T; Verwoerd JL; Wildberger JE; Beets-Tan RG
Ann Surg; 2011 Mar; 253(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 21239980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
Akasu T; Iinuma G; Takawa M; Yamamoto S; Muramatsu Y; Moriyama N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):2787-94. PubMed ID: 19618244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic implications of the distribution of lymph node metastases in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Leibold T; Shia J; Ruo L; Minsky BD; Akhurst T; Gollub MJ; Ginsberg MS; Larson S; Riedel E; Wong WD; Guillem JG
J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(13):2106-11. PubMed ID: 18362367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of lateral lymph node metastasis in lower rectal cancer: analysis of paraffin-embedded sections.
Ishida H; Hatano S; Ishiguro T; Kumamoto K; Ishibashi K; Haga N
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jun; 42(6):485-90. PubMed ID: 22457325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or stage III lower rectal cancer (JCOG0212): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial.
Fujita S; Akasu T; Mizusawa J; Saito N; Kinugasa Y; Kanemitsu Y; Ohue M; Fujii S; Shiozawa M; Yamaguchi T; Moriya Y;
Lancet Oncol; 2012 Jun; 13(6):616-21. PubMed ID: 22591948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performance of multidetector row computed tomography for assessment of lymph node metastasis in patients with distal rectal cancer.
Kobayashi H; Kikuchi A; Okazaki S; Ishiguro M; Ishikawa T; Iida S; Uetake H; Sugihara K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 25124470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of nodal enhancement pattern of rectal cancer at MRI enhanced with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide: findings in pathologically matched mesorectal lymph nodes.
Koh DM; George C; Temple L; Collins DJ; Toomey P; Raja A; Bett N; Farhat S; Husband JE; Brown G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):W505-13. PubMed ID: 20489069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lymph node yield in rectal cancer surgery: effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
Morcos B; Baker B; Al Masri M; Haddad H; Hashem S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 20071133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
Kim CK; Kim SH; Choi D; Kim MJ; Chun HK; Lee SJ; Lee JM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 18043346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.
Meyenberger C; Huch Böni RA; Bertschinger P; Zala GF; Klotz HP; Krestin GP
Endoscopy; 1995 Sep; 27(7):469-79. PubMed ID: 8565885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can CT replace MRI in preoperative assessment of the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer?
Maizlin ZV; Brown JA; So G; Brown C; Phang TP; Walker ML; Kirby JM; Vora P; Tiwari P
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Mar; 53(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 20173478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in preoperative lymph node detection of uterine cervical cancer.
Chung HH; Kang KW; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Chung JK; Kang SB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 203(2):156.e1-5. PubMed ID: 20435285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected rectal cancer: determining tumor localization, stage, and sphincter-saving resectability at 3-Tesla-sustained high resolution.
Winter L; Bruhn H; Langrehr J; Neuhaus P; Felix R; Hänninen LE
Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 17453515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EUS-FNA assessment of extramesenteric lymph node status in primary rectal cancer.
Gleeson FC; Clain JE; Rajan E; Topazian MD; Wang KK; Levy MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Oct; 74(4):897-905. PubMed ID: 21839439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of pathological stage and circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer].
Jiang JB; Dai Y; Zhang XM; Li CF; Jin ZT; Bi DS; Sun JZ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 86(14):961-4. PubMed ID: 16759535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The ability of phased-array MRI in preoperative staging of primary rectal cancer: correlation with histopathological results.
Karatağ O; Karatağ GY; Özkurt H; Değirmenci HK; Avlanmış Ö; Başak M; Baykan A
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2012; 18(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 21671218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
Keane C; Young M
ANZ J Surg; 2014 Oct; 84(10):758-62. PubMed ID: 24751125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison.
Brown G; Richards CJ; Bourne MW; Newcombe RG; Radcliffe AG; Dallimore NS; Williams GT
Radiology; 2003 May; 227(2):371-7. PubMed ID: 12732695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection can be omitted in lower rectal cancer in which the longest lateral pelvic and perirectal lymph node is less than 5 mm on MRI.
Ogawa S; Itabashi M; Hirosawa T; Hashimoto T; Bamba Y; Kameoka S
J Surg Oncol; 2014 Mar; 109(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 24165955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
