BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24316947)

  • 1. Systematic review of internet patient information on colorectal cancer surgery.
    Wasserman M; Baxter NN; Rosen B; Burnstein M; Halverson AL
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Jan; 57(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 24316947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the Quality of Patient-Orientated Information on Surgery for Crohn's Disease on the Internet.
    Yeung TM; Sacchi M; Mortensen NJ; Spinelli A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Sep; 58(9):857-61. PubMed ID: 26252847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the quality of patient-orientated Internet information on surgery for diverticular disease.
    Yeung TM; Mortensen NJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 22156872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of Internet information on the controversial X-Stop device.
    Anderson JT; Sullivan TB; Ahn UM; Ahn NU
    Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2412-9. PubMed ID: 24509178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Quality of Printed Online Education Materials in Cosmetic Facial Plastic Surgery.
    Alwani MM; Campiti VJ; Bandali EH; Nesemeier BR; Ting JY; Shipchandler TZ
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2020; 22(4):255-261. PubMed ID: 32267787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the quality of web-based information on bunions.
    Chong YM; Fraval A; Chandrananth J; Plunkett V; Tran P
    Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Aug; 34(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 23478888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Googling endometriosis: a systematic review of information available on the Internet.
    Hirsch M; Aggarwal S; Barker C; Davis CJ; Duffy JMN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):451-458.e1. PubMed ID: 27840143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating internet health resources in ear, nose, and throat surgery.
    Goslin RA; Elhassan HA
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Jul; 123(7):1626-31. PubMed ID: 23720201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet.
    Grewal P; Alagaratnam S
    Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 23523948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the quality and content of web-based stoma information.
    Connelly TM; Khan MS; Alzamzami M; Cooke F
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Mar; 21(3):349-356. PubMed ID: 30472797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Physician-Patient Communication in Online Health Communities on Patient Compliance: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.
    Lu X; Zhang R
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 May; 21(5):e12891. PubMed ID: 31094342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Internet Presentation of Departments of Pediatric Surgery in Germany and Their Compliance with Recommended Criteria for Promoting Services and Offering Professional Information for Patients.
    Farhat N; Zoeller C; Petersen C; Ure B
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2016 Aug; 26(4):344-8. PubMed ID: 26409264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of natural health products in treating osteoporosis: what is the quality of internet patient advice?
    Whelan AM; Jurgens TM; Bowles SK; Doyle H
    Ann Pharmacother; 2009 May; 43(5):899-907. PubMed ID: 19417114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic review of online resources to support patient decision-making for full-thickness rectal prolapse surgery.
    Fowler GE; Baker DM; Lee MJ; Brown SR
    Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Nov; 21(11):853-862. PubMed ID: 29101494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A COMPARISON OF PATIENT AND HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIEWS WHEN ASSESSING QUALITY OF INFORMATION ON PITUITARY ADENOMA AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET.
    Druce I; Williams C; Baggoo C; Keely E; Malcolm J
    Endocr Pract; 2017 Oct; 23(10):1217-1222. PubMed ID: 28816540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of information quality on the internet for periodontal disease patients.
    Kanmaz B; Buduneli N
    Oral Dis; 2021 Mar; 27(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 32671923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the Quality of Online Health Information and Trend Data for Colorectal Malignancies.
    Beauharnais CC; Aulet T; Rodriguez-Silva J; Konen J; Sturrock PR; Alavi K; Maykel JA; Davids JS
    J Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 283():923-928. PubMed ID: 36915020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing Patient Burden and Improving Data Quality With the New Cleveland Clinic Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire.
    Zutshi M; Aiello A; Fuerst A; Golcher H; Parc Y; Galandiuk S; Hull TL; Ruppert R
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Apr; 63(4):469-487. PubMed ID: 32015285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surfing for scoliosis: the quality of information available on the Internet.
    Mathur S; Shanti N; Brkaric M; Sood V; Kubeck J; Paulino C; Merola AA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(23):2695-700. PubMed ID: 16319757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the readability, quality and accuracy of online health information for patients with low anterior resection syndrome following surgery for rectal cancer.
    Garfinkle R; Wong-Chong N; Petrucci A; Sylla P; Wexner SD; Bhatnagar S; Morin N; Boutros M
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 May; 21(5):523-531. PubMed ID: 30609222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.