1998 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24317239)
1. Outcomes Analysis of Biologic Mesh Use for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Clean-Contaminated and Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair.
Sbitany H; Kwon E; Chern H; Finlayson E; Varma MG; Hansen SL
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Aug; 75(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 24317239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh.
Rosen MJ; Krpata DM; Ermlich B; Blatnik JA
Ann Surg; 2013 Jun; 257(6):991-6. PubMed ID: 23426340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study between biologic porcine dermal meshes: risk factors of postoperative morbidity and recurrence.
Romain B; Story F; Meyer N; Delhorme JB; Brigand C; Rohr S
J Wound Care; 2016 Jun; 25(6):320-5. PubMed ID: 27286664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary fascial closure with biologic mesh reinforcement results in lesser complication and recurrence rates than bridged biologic mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction: A propensity score analysis.
Giordano S; Garvey PB; Baumann DP; Liu J; Butler CE
Surgery; 2017 Feb; 161(2):499-508. PubMed ID: 27810091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix are not affected by wound contamination.
Garvey PB; Martinez RA; Baumann DP; Liu J; Butler CE
J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Nov; 219(5):853-64. PubMed ID: 25440025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suture, synthetic, or biologic in contaminated ventral hernia repair.
Bondre IL; Holihan JL; Askenasy EP; Greenberg JA; Keith JN; Martindale RG; Roth JS; Liang MK;
J Surg Res; 2016 Feb; 200(2):488-94. PubMed ID: 26424112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement.
Patel KM; Nahabedian MY; Gatti M; Bhanot P
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 22156887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing complications and cost-utilization in ventral hernia repair utilizing biologic mesh in a bridged underlay technique.
Basta MN; Fischer JP; Kovach SJ
Am J Surg; 2015 Apr; 209(4):695-702. PubMed ID: 25305799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair.
Liang MK; Berger RL; Nguyen MT; Hicks SC; Li LT; Leong M
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Oct; 15(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 25215466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: an outcomes review.
Henry CR; Bradburn E; Moyer KE
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Sep; 71(3):266-8. PubMed ID: 23945531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of high-risk, comorbid patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh.
Krpata DM; Blatnik JA; Novitsky YW; Rosen MJ
Surgery; 2013 Jan; 153(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 22862901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of a bioprosthetic mesh in complex hernia repair: early results from a French multicenter pilot study.
Lupinacci RM; Gizard AS; Rivkine E; Debove C; Menegaux F; Barrat C; Wind P; Trésallet C
Surg Innov; 2014 Dec; 21(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 24496103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Open retromuscular mesh repair of complex incisional hernia: predictors of wound events and recurrence.
Cobb WS; Warren JA; Ewing JA; Burnikel A; Merchant M; Carbonell AM
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Apr; 220(4):606-13. PubMed ID: 25797746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.
Sorour MA
Int J Surg; 2014; 12(6):578-86. PubMed ID: 24793234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hernia recurrence and infection rate in elective complex abdominal wall repair using biologic mesh.
Kanitra JJ; Hess AL; Haan PS; Anderson CI; Kavuturu S
BMC Surg; 2019 Nov; 19(1):174. PubMed ID: 31752803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs.
Majumder A; Winder JS; Wen Y; Pauli EM; Belyansky I; Novitsky YW
Surgery; 2016 Oct; 160(4):828-838. PubMed ID: 27452954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Noncrosslinked porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix for single-stage complex abdominal wall herniorrhaphy after removal of infected synthetic mesh: a retrospective review.
Guerra O
Am Surg; 2014 May; 80(5):489-95. PubMed ID: 24887729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs.
Carbonell AM; Criss CN; Cobb WS; Novitsky YW; Rosen MJ
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Dec; 217(6):991-8. PubMed ID: 24045140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective repair of Ventral Hernia Working Group type 3 and 4 abdominal wall defects with condensed polytetrafluoroethylene (MotifMESH) mesh.
Cheesborough JE; Liu J; Hsu D; Dumanian GA
Am J Surg; 2016 Jan; 211(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 26184351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction.
Booth JH; Garvey PB; Baumann DP; Selber JC; Nguyen AT; Clemens MW; Liu J; Butler CE
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Dec; 217(6):999-1009. PubMed ID: 24083910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
