424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24317521)
1. A simplification and implementation of random-effects meta-analyses based on the exact distribution of Cochran's Q.
Preuß M; Ziegler A
Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 24317521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Misunderstandings about Q and 'Cochran's Q test' in meta-analysis.
Hoaglin DC
Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(4):485-95. PubMed ID: 26303773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the Q statistic with constant weights for standardized mean difference.
Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 Nov; 75(3):444-465. PubMed ID: 35094381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incorporating variability in estimates of heterogeneity in the random effects model in meta-analysis.
Biggerstaff BJ; Tweedie RL
Stat Med; 1997 Apr; 16(7):753-68. PubMed ID: 9131763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis using generalised Cochran heterogeneity statistics.
Jackson D
Res Synth Methods; 2013 Sep; 4(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 26053842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The exact distribution of Cochran's heterogeneity statistic in one-way random effects meta-analysis.
Biggerstaff BJ; Jackson D
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6093-110. PubMed ID: 18781561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios.
Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):426-442. PubMed ID: 32112619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation in meta-analyses of mean difference and standardized mean difference.
Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
Stat Med; 2020 Jan; 39(2):171-191. PubMed ID: 31709582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Q statistic with constant weights for assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
Kulinskaya E; Hoaglin DC; Bakbergenuly I; Newman J
Res Synth Methods; 2021 Nov; 12(6):711-730. PubMed ID: 33969638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cochran's Q test was useful to assess heterogeneity in likelihood ratios in studies of diagnostic accuracy.
Cohen JF; Chalumeau M; Cohen R; Korevaar DA; Khoshnood B; Bossuyt PM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 25441698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An accurate test for homogeneity of odds ratios based on Cochran's Q-statistic.
Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Jun; 15():49. PubMed ID: 26054650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical interpretation of Cochran's Q test depends on power and prior assumptions about heterogeneity.
Pereira TV; Patsopoulos NA; Salanti G; Ioannidis JP
Res Synth Methods; 2010 Apr; 1(2):149-61. PubMed ID: 26061380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multivariate meta-analysis: a robust approach based on the theory of U-statistic.
Ma Y; Mazumdar M
Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2911-29. PubMed ID: 21830230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability.
Hamza TH; van Houwelingen HC; Stijnen T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 61(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 18083461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Classical and Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis models with sample quality weights in gene expression studies.
Siangphoe U; Archer KJ; Mukhopadhyay ND
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):18. PubMed ID: 30626315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Considerations for pooling real-world data as a comparator cohort to a single arm trial: a simulation study on assessment of heterogeneity.
Backenroth D; Royce T; Pinheiro J; Samant M; Humblet O
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Aug; 23(1):193. PubMed ID: 37620758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the Q statistic with constant weights in meta-analysis of binary outcomes.
Kulinskaya E; Hoaglin DC
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jun; 23(1):146. PubMed ID: 37344771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
