75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24318746)
1. Evaluation of the Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool (EFAT2) within palliative care: a pilot study.
Gardiner A; Samuel D
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2014 Jun; 26(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 24318746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cultural Adaptation and Testing of the Italian Version of the Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool-2 (EFAT2-I).
Magrelli A; Scannavini P; D'Angelo D; Latini CM; Felli S; Di Nitto M; Russo G; Mastroianni C; Navalesi G; Casale G
J Palliat Care; 2024 Jan; 39(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 34967256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychometric Properties of the Japanese Version of the Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool 2.
Zogo Y; Hoshino K; Serizawa K; Iwase A; Tsuji T
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2024 Feb; 67(2):157-166. PubMed ID: 37944624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Facilitating needs-based support and palliative care for people with chronic heart failure: preliminary evidence for the acceptability, inter-rater reliability, and validity of a needs assessment tool.
Waller A; Girgis A; Davidson PM; Newton PJ; Lecathelinais C; Macdonald PS; Hayward CS; Currow DC
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2013 May; 45(5):912-25. PubMed ID: 23017612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Palliative Performance Scale: cross cultural adaptation and psychometric validation for Polish hospice setting.
Dzierżanowski T; Gradalski T; Kozlowski M
BMC Palliat Care; 2020 Apr; 19(1):52. PubMed ID: 32321494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The palliative performance scale: examining its inter-rater reliability in an outpatient palliative radiation oncology clinic.
Campos S; Zhang L; Sinclair E; Tsao M; Barnes EA; Danjoux C; Sahgal A; Goh P; Culleton S; Mitera G; Chow E
Support Care Cancer; 2009 Jun; 17(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 18946683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool: preliminary development and evaluation for use in palliative care.
Kaasa T; Loomis J; Gillis K; Bruera E; Hanson J
J Pain Symptom Manage; 1997 Jan; 13(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 9029857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter-rater reliability of formally trained and self-trained raters using the Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool.
Kaasa T; Wessel J; Darrah J; Bruera E
Palliat Med; 2000 Nov; 14(6):509-17. PubMed ID: 11219881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Palliative care rehabilitation survey: a pilot study of patients' priorities for rehabilitation goals.
Schleinich MA; Warren S; Nekolaichuk C; Kaasa T; Watanabe S
Palliat Med; 2008 Oct; 22(7):822-30. PubMed ID: 18772213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and reliability of a novel measure of activity performance and participation.
Murgatroyd P; Karimi L
Disabil Rehabil; 2016; 38(4):374-83. PubMed ID: 25918962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the Polish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 15 - Palliative Care in patients with advanced cancer.
Leppert W; Majkowicz M
Palliat Med; 2013 May; 27(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 22988041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Palliative sedation: reliability and validity of sedation scales.
Arevalo JJ; Brinkkemper T; van der Heide A; Rietjens JA; Ribbe M; Deliens L; Loer SA; Zuurmond WW; Perez RS;
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2012 Nov; 44(5):704-14. PubMed ID: 22819440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the palliative outcome scale in Argentina: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation study.
Eisenchlas JH; Harding R; Daud ML; Pérez M; De Simone GG; Higginson IJ
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2008 Feb; 35(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 18082359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring palliative care quality for seriously ill hospitalized patients.
Hanson LC; Rowe C; Wessell K; Caprio A; Winzelberg G; Beyea A; Bernard SA
J Palliat Med; 2012 Jul; 15(7):798-804. PubMed ID: 22687268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and validation of a measurement tool to assess perceptions of palliative care.
Milne D; Aranda S; Jefford M; Schofield P
Psychooncology; 2013 Apr; 22(4):940-6. PubMed ID: 22451082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-rater reliability of the Barthel ADL index: how does a researcher compare to a nurse?
Richards SH; Peters TJ; Coast J; Gunnell DJ; Darlow MA; Pounsford J
Clin Rehabil; 2000 Feb; 14(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 10688347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The adaptation of the Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral for Care (SPARC) to the Polish clinical setting for needs assessment of advanced cancer patients.
Leppert W; Majkowicz M; Ahmedzai SH
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2012 Dec; 44(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 22926084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Developing a comprehensive cancer specific geriatric assessment tool.
Rao S; Salins N; Deodhar J; Muckaden M
Indian J Cancer; 2015; 52(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 26837987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Palliative Care Phase: inter-rater reliability and acceptability in a national study.
Masso M; Allingham SF; Banfield M; Johnson CE; Pidgeon T; Yates P; Eagar K
Palliat Med; 2015 Jan; 29(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25249239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
