318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24319101)
1. Using data and quality monitoring to enhance maternity outcomes: a qualitative study of risk managers' perspectives.
Simms RA; Yelland A; Ping H; Beringer AJ; Draycott TJ; Fox R
BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Jun; 23(6):457-64. PubMed ID: 24319101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of maternity dashboards across a UK health region; current practice, continuing problems.
Simms RA; Ping H; Yelland A; Beringer AJ; Fox R; Draycott TJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 23830353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 'Lending the space': midwives' perceptions of birth space and clinical risk management.
Seibold C; Licqurish S; Rolls C; Hopkins F
Midwifery; 2010 Oct; 26(5):526-31. PubMed ID: 20692078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Knowledge management infrastructure to support quality improvement: A qualitative study of maternity services in four European hospitals.
Karltun A; Sanne JM; Aase K; Anderson JE; Fernandes A; Fulop NJ; Höglund PJ; Andersson-Gare B
Health Policy; 2020 Feb; 124(2):205-215. PubMed ID: 31928857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the implementation of the model of integrated and humanised midwifery health services in Santiago, Chile.
Binfa L; Pantoja L; Ortiz J; Gurovich M; Cavada G
Midwifery; 2013 Oct; 29(10):1151-7. PubMed ID: 23932035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Immigrant women's experience of maternity services in Canada: a meta-ethnography.
Higginbottom GM; Hadziabdic E; Yohani S; Paton P
Midwifery; 2014 May; 30(5):544-59. PubMed ID: 23948185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health-care professionals' views about safety in maternity services: a qualitative study.
Smith AH; Dixon AL; Page LA
Midwifery; 2009 Feb; 25(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 19095334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.
Hood L; Fenwick J; Butt J
Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):268-85. PubMed ID: 18804902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How midwives' discursive practices contribute to the maintenance of the status quo in English maternity care.
Pollard KC
Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):612-9. PubMed ID: 20692743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Maternal Quality Improvement Program: A Clinical Data-Driven National Registry for Maternity Care.
Butler T; Hasley S; Currigan SM; Levy BS
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 129(5):934-938. PubMed ID: 28383384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing the utilisation of free-standing and alongside midwifery units in England: a qualitative research study.
Walsh D; Spiby H; McCourt C; Grigg C; Coleby D; Bishop S; Scanlon M; Culley L; Wilkinson J; Pacanowski L; Thornton J
BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e033895. PubMed ID: 32071182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Health services research related to performance indicators and benchmarking in Europe.
Klazinga N; Fischer C; ten Asbroek A
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Jul; 16 Suppl 2():38-47. PubMed ID: 21737528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Staffing in postnatal units: is it adequate for the provision of quality care? Staff perspectives from a state-wide review of postnatal care in Victoria, Australia.
Forster DA; McLachlan HL; Yelland J; Rayner J; Lumley J; Davey MA
BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Jul; 6():83. PubMed ID: 16817974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Midwifery care in rural and remote British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes of rural parturient women with a midwife involved in their care, 2003 to 2008.
Stoll K; Kornelsen J
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 24588878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality indicator development and implementation in maternity units.
Boulkedid R; Alberti C; Sibony O
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):609-19. PubMed ID: 23642350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The struggle for contested boundaries in the move to collaborative care teams in Australian maternity care.
McIntyre M; Francis K; Chapman Y
Midwifery; 2012 Jun; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 21993203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Caseload midwifery as organisational change: the interplay between professional and organisational projects in Denmark.
Burau V; Overgaard C
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 May; 15():121. PubMed ID: 26013394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors influencing water immersion during labour: qualitative case studies of six maternity units in the United Kingdom.
Milosevic S; Channon S; Hughes J; Hunter B; Nolan M; Milton R; Sanders J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Nov; 20(1):719. PubMed ID: 33228569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rural and regional maternity managers' and educators' views of the Maternity and Newborn Emergencies (MANE) education program in Victoria, Australia: a qualitative descriptive study.
Zugna SA; McLachlan HL; Cullinane M; Newton M; Forster DA
BMC Health Serv Res; 2024 Jan; 24(1):8. PubMed ID: 38172818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are stipulated requirements for the quality of maternity care complied with?
Johansen LT; Pay ASD; Broen L; Roland B; Øian P
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2017 Sep; 137(17):. PubMed ID: 28925199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
