These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24320007)

  • 61. Tests of an exemplar-memory model of classification learning in a high-dimensional natural-science category domain.
    Nosofsky RM; Sanders CA; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Mar; 147(3):328-353. PubMed ID: 29058939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Modeling a flexible representation machinery of human concept learning.
    Matsuka T; Sakamoto Y; Chouchourelou A
    Neural Netw; 2008; 21(2-3):289-302. PubMed ID: 18243653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Statistical learning within and between modalities: pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations.
    Conway CM; Christiansen MH
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Oct; 17(10):905-12. PubMed ID: 17100792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Age, typicality, and task effects on categorization of objects.
    Blewitt P; Durkin M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Oct; 55(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 7155742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Will a category cue attract you? Motor output reveals dynamic competition across person construal.
    Freeman JB; Ambady N; Rule NO; Johnson KL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):673-90. PubMed ID: 18999360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Modeling the effect of mood on dimensional attention during categorization.
    Zivot MT; Cohen AL; Kapucu A
    Emotion; 2013 Aug; 13(4):703-10. PubMed ID: 23627722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Premise typicality as feature inference decision-making in perceptual categories.
    Morgan EL; Johansen MK
    Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):817-836. PubMed ID: 34623605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Learning categories via rules and similarity: comparing adults and children.
    Rabi R; Miles SJ; Minda JP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Mar; 131():149-69. PubMed ID: 25558860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Learning abstract relations from using categories.
    Ross BH; Warren JL
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jul; 30(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 12219883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The paradox of the universal triangle: Concepts, language, and prototypes.
    Lupyan G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):389-412. PubMed ID: 26731302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Dynamic updating of hippocampal object representations reflects new conceptual knowledge.
    Mack ML; Love BC; Preston AR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Nov; 113(46):13203-13208. PubMed ID: 27803320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Features of graded category structure: Generalizing the family resemblance and polymorphous concept models.
    Dry MJ; Storms G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Mar; 133(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 20053389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The indirect modification of categorical knowledge.
    Homa D; Rogers D; Lancaster ME
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 24838308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Featuring familiarity: how a familiar feature instantiation influences categorization.
    Hannah SD; Brooks LR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Dec; 63(4):263-75. PubMed ID: 20025385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Do Additional Features Help or Hurt Category Learning? The Curse of Dimensionality in Human Learners.
    Vong WK; Hendrickson AT; Navarro DJ; Perfors A
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Mar; 43(3):e12724. PubMed ID: 30900291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Explanation and prior knowledge interact to guide learning.
    Williams JJ; Lombrozo T
    Cogn Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):55-84. PubMed ID: 23099291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Human learning of elemental category structures: revising the classic result of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961).
    Kurtz KJ; Levering KR; Stanton RD; Romero J; Morris SN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):552-72. PubMed ID: 22799282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.
    Minda JP; Smith JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):775-99. PubMed ID: 11394680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. What's behind different kinds of kinds: effects of statistical density on learning and representation of categories.
    Kloos H; Sloutsky VM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):52-72. PubMed ID: 18248129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Designing Reciprocative Dynamic Linking to improve learners' Representational Competence in interactive learning environments.
    Patwardhan M; Murthy S
    Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn; 2017; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 30613259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.