541 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24320195)
41. Assessing Effectiveness and Costs in Robot-Mediated Lower Limbs Rehabilitation: A Meta-Analysis and State of the Art.
Carpino G; Pezzola A; Urbano M; Guglielmelli E
J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():7492024. PubMed ID: 29973978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A spherical parallel three degrees-of-freedom robot for ankle-foot neuro-rehabilitation.
Malosio M; Negri SP; Pedrocchi N; Vicentini F; Caimmi M; Molinari Tosatti L
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():3356-9. PubMed ID: 23366645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. "MRI Stealth" robot for prostate interventions.
Stoianovici D; Song D; Petrisor D; Ursu D; Mazilu D; Muntener M; Schar M; Patriciu A
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2007; 16(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 17763098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Wearable Ankle Robots in Post-stroke Rehabilitation of Gait: A Systematic Review.
Shi B; Chen X; Yue Z; Yin S; Weng Q; Zhang X; Wang J; Wen W
Front Neurorobot; 2019; 13():63. PubMed ID: 31456681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Effects of robot-guided passive stretching and active movement training of ankle and mobility impairments in stroke.
Waldman G; Yang CY; Ren Y; Liu L; Guo X; Harvey RL; Roth EJ; Zhang LQ
NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 32(3):625-34. PubMed ID: 23648617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Design of a Lightweight Soft Robotic Arm Using Pneumatic Artificial Muscles and Inflatable Sleeves.
Ohta P; Valle L; King J; Low K; Yi J; Atkeson CG; Park YL
Soft Robot; 2018 Apr; 5(2):204-215. PubMed ID: 29648951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Development of a 3D parallel mechanism robot arm with three vertical-axial pneumatic actuators combined with a stereo vision system.
Chiang MH; Lin HT
Sensors (Basel); 2011; 11(12):11476-94. PubMed ID: 22247676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Reviewing Clinical Effectiveness of Active Training Strategies of Platform-Based Ankle Rehabilitation Robots.
Zeng X; Zhu G; Zhang M; Xie SQ
J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():2858294. PubMed ID: 29675142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Design and control of a bio-inspired soft wearable robotic device for ankle-foot rehabilitation.
Park YL; Chen BR; Pérez-Arancibia NO; Young D; Stirling L; Wood RJ; Goldfield EC; Nagpal R
Bioinspir Biomim; 2014 Mar; 9(1):016007. PubMed ID: 24434598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Tailor-made rehabilitation approach using multiple types of hybrid assistive limb robots for acute stroke patients: A pilot study.
Fukuda H; Morishita T; Ogata T; Saita K; Hyakutake K; Watanabe J; Shiota E; Inoue T
Assist Technol; 2016; 28(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 26478988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Analysis and control of biped robot with variable stiffness ankle joints.
Lin Z; Zang X; Zhang X; Liu Y; Heng S
Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(S1):453-462. PubMed ID: 32364178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A survey of bio-inspired compliant legged robot designs.
Zhou X; Bi S
Bioinspir Biomim; 2012 Dec; 7(4):041001. PubMed ID: 23151609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation: A Pediatric Robot for Ankle Rehabilitation.
Michmizos KP; Rossi S; Castelli E; Cappa P; Krebs HI
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2015 Nov; 23(6):1056-67. PubMed ID: 25769168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Softworms: the design and control of non-pneumatic, 3D-printed, deformable robots.
Umedachi T; Vikas V; Trimmer BA
Bioinspir Biomim; 2016 Mar; 11(2):025001. PubMed ID: 26963596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Design of a series elastic actuator for a compliant parallel wrist rehabilitation robot.
Sergi F; Lee MM; O'Malley MK
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650481. PubMed ID: 24187298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Human-robot coupling dynamic modeling and analysis for upper limb rehabilitation robots.
Xie Q; Meng Q; Dai Y; Zeng Q; Fan Y; Yu H
Technol Health Care; 2021; 29(4):709-723. PubMed ID: 33386832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Evolving self-assembly in autonomous homogeneous robots: experiments with two physical robots.
Ampatzis C; Tuci E; Trianni V; Christensen AL; Dorigo M
Artif Life; 2009; 15(4):465-84. PubMed ID: 19463056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Stroke Rehabilitation: Therapy Robots and Assistive Devices.
Klamroth-Marganska V
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1065():579-587. PubMed ID: 30051408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Clinical designs of recent robot rehabilitation trials.
Lo AC
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 91(11 Suppl 3):S204-16. PubMed ID: 23080037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Towards extended virtual presence of the therapist in stroke rehabilitation.
Jung HT; Takahashi T; Choe YK; Baird J; Foster T; Grupen RA
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650345. PubMed ID: 24187164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
