451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24320411)
1. A virtual phantom library for the quantification of deformable image registration uncertainties in patients with cancers of the head and neck.
Pukala J; Meeks SL; Staton RJ; Bova FJ; Mañon RR; Langen KM
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111703. PubMed ID: 24320411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A GPU based high-resolution multilevel biomechanical head and neck model for validating deformable image registration.
Neylon J; Qi X; Sheng K; Staton R; Pukala J; Manon R; Low DA; Kupelian P; Santhanam A
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):232-43. PubMed ID: 25563263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The evaluation of a hybrid biomechanical deformable registration method on a multistage physical phantom with reproducible deformation.
Qin A; Ionascu D; Liang J; Han X; O'Connell N; Yan D
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):240. PubMed ID: 30514348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations.
Nie K; Chuang C; Kirby N; Braunstein S; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041911. PubMed ID: 23556905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benchmarking of five commercial deformable image registration algorithms for head and neck patients.
Pukala J; Johnson PB; Shah AP; Langen KM; Bova FJ; Staton RJ; Mañon RR; Kelly P; Meeks SL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):25-40. PubMed ID: 27167256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A deformable head and neck phantom with in-vivo dosimetry for adaptive radiotherapy quality assurance.
Graves YJ; Smith AA; Mcilvena D; Manilay Z; Lai YK; Rice R; Mell L; Jia X; Jiang SB; Cerviño L
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1490-7. PubMed ID: 25832039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: Uncertainties in dose warping due to the choice of deformable registration algorithm.
Veiga C; Lourenço AM; Mouinuddin S; van Herk M; Modat M; Ourselin S; Royle G; McClelland JR
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):760-9. PubMed ID: 25652490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A neural network approach for fast, automated quantification of DIR performance.
Neylon J; Min Y; Low DA; Santhanam A
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4126-4138. PubMed ID: 28477340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The distance discordance metric-a novel approach to quantifying spatial uncertainties in intra- and inter-patient deformable image registration.
Saleh ZH; Apte AP; Sharp GC; Shusharina NP; Wang Y; Veeraraghavan H; Thor M; Muren LP; Rao SS; Lee NY; Deasy JO
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 59(3):733-46. PubMed ID: 24440838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of 12 DIR algorithms in low-contrast regions for mass and density conserving deformation.
Yeo UJ; Supple JR; Taylor ML; Smith R; Kron T; Franich RD
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101701. PubMed ID: 24089891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variability in commercially available deformable image registration: A multi-institution analysis using virtual head and neck phantoms.
Kubli A; Pukala J; Shah AP; Kelly P; Langen KM; Bova FJ; Mañon RR; Meeks SL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 May; 22(5):89-96. PubMed ID: 33783960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration.
Kirby N; Chuang C; Ueda U; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011702. PubMed ID: 23298072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Creating patient-specific digital phantoms with a longitudinal atlas for evaluating deformable CT-CBCT registration in adaptive lung radiotherapy.
Meyer S; Alam S; Kuo LC; Hu YC; Liu Y; Lu W; Yorke E; Li A; Cerviño L; Zhang P
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 37449537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the accuracy of deformable image registration on MRI with a physical phantom.
Wu RY; Liu AY; Yang J; Williamson TD; Wisdom PG; Bronk L; Gao S; Grosshan DR; Fuller DC; Gunn GB; Ronald Zhu X; Frank SJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):166-173. PubMed ID: 31808307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A three-dimensional head-and-neck phantom for validation of multimodality deformable image registration for adaptive radiotherapy.
Singhrao K; Kirby N; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121709. PubMed ID: 25471956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative Analysis Tools and Digital Phantoms for Deformable Image Registration Quality Assurance.
Kim H; Park SB; Monroe JI; Traughber BJ; Zheng Y; Lo SS; Yao M; Mansur D; Ellis R; Machtay M; Sohn JW
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Aug; 14(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 25336380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An automated deformable image registration evaluation of confidence tool.
Kirby N; Chen J; Kim H; Morin O; Nie K; Pouliot J
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Apr; 61(8):N203-14. PubMed ID: 27025957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The level of detail required in a deformable phantom to accurately perform quality assurance of deformable image registration.
Saenz DL; Kim H; Chen J; Stathakis S; Kirby N
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6269-80. PubMed ID: 27494827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A quantitative evaluation of deformable image registration based on MV cone beam CT images: Impact of deformation magnitudes and image modalities.
Huang Y; Li C; Wang H; Hu Q; Wang R; Chang C; Ma W; Li W; Wu H; Zhang Y
Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():82-87. PubMed ID: 32097874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comprehensive evaluation of ten deformable image registration algorithms for contour propagation between CT and cone-beam CT images in adaptive head & neck radiotherapy.
Li X; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Wu S; Xiao Y; Gu X; Zhen X; Zhou L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175906. PubMed ID: 28414799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
