544 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24320412)
1. Fan-beam intensity modulated proton therapy.
Hill P; Westerly D; Mackie T
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111704. PubMed ID: 24320412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two methods for minimizing the effect of delayed charge on the dose delivered with a synchrotron based discrete spot scanning proton beam.
Whitaker TJ; Beltran C; Tryggestad E; Bues M; Kruse JJ; Remmes NB; Tasson A; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081703. PubMed ID: 25086513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of common dental fixtures on treatment planning and delivery for head and neck intensity modulated proton therapy.
Hu YH; Seum WCTH; Hunzeker A; Muller O; Foote RL; Mundy DW
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 24(7):e13973. PubMed ID: 36972299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Universal Range Shifter and Range Compensator Can Enable Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Single-Energy Bragg Peak FLASH-RT Treatment Using Current Commercially Available Proton Systems.
Kang M; Wei S; Choi JI; Lin H; Simone CB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2022 May; 113(1):203-213. PubMed ID: 35101597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and long-term stability of a comprehensive daily QA program for a modern pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy delivery system.
Rana S; Bennouna J; Samuel EJJ; Gutierrez AN
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):29-44. PubMed ID: 30920146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Monte-Carlo study to assess the effect of 1.5 T magnetic fields on the overall robustness of pencil-beam scanning proton radiotherapy plans for prostate cancer.
Kurz C; Landry G; Resch AF; Dedes G; Kamp F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Raaymakers BW; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8470-8482. PubMed ID: 29047455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Spot Size and Beam-Shaping Devices on the Treatment Plan Quality for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.
Moteabbed M; Yock TI; Depauw N; Madden TM; Kooy HM; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):190-198. PubMed ID: 27084640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design and characterization of an aperture system and spot configuration for ocular treatments with a gantry-based spot scanning proton beam.
Hickling SV; Corner S; Kruse JJ; Deisher AJ
Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4521-4532. PubMed ID: 37084072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Design and commissioning of the non-dedicated scanning proton beamline for ocular treatment at the synchrotron-based CNAO facility.
Ciocca M; Magro G; Mastella E; Mairani A; Mirandola A; Molinelli S; Russo S; Vai A; Fiore MR; Mosci C; Valvo F; Via R; Baroni G; Orecchia R
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1852-1862. PubMed ID: 30659616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comprehensive Monte Carlo study of out-of-field secondary neutron spectra in a scanned-beam proton therapy gantry room.
Englbrecht FS; Trinkl S; Mares V; Rühm W; Wielunski M; Wilkens JJ; Hillbrand M; Parodi K
Z Med Phys; 2021 May; 31(2):215-228. PubMed ID: 33622567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of proton pencil beam positioning in collimated fields.
Behrends C; Bäumer C; Verbeek NG; Wulff J; Timmermann B
Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2540-2551. PubMed ID: 36609847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maximizing the biological effect of proton dose delivered with scanned beams via inhomogeneous daily dose distributions.
Zeng C; Giantsoudi D; Grassberger C; Goldberg S; Niemierko A; Paganetti H; Efstathiou JA; Trofimov A
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051708. PubMed ID: 23635256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shielding implications for secondary neutrons and photons produced within the patient during IMPT.
DeMarco J; Kupelian P; Santhanam A; Low D
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071701. PubMed ID: 23822405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A GPU-accelerated and Monte Carlo-based intensity modulated proton therapy optimization system.
Ma J; Beltran C; Seum Wan Chan Tseung H; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121707. PubMed ID: 25471954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implication of spot position error on plan quality and patient safety in pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy.
Yu J; Beltran CJ; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081706. PubMed ID: 25086516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and validation of the Dynamic Collimation Monte Carlo simulation package for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Nelson NP; Culberson WS; Hyer DE; Geoghegan TJ; Patwardhan KA; Smith BR; Flynn RT; Yu J; Rana S; Gutiérrez AN; Hill PM
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3172-3185. PubMed ID: 33740253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRI-guided proton therapy planning: accounting for an inline MRI fringe field.
Burigo LN; Oborn BM
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Nov; 64(21):215015. PubMed ID: 31509819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
