167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24320436)
21. ROC curves predicted by a model of visual search.
Chakraborty DP
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(14):3463-82. PubMed ID: 16825743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems.
Metz CE
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 17412096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Area under the free-response ROC curve (FROC) and a related summary index.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Song T; Gur D
Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 18479482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. ROC, LROC, FROC, AFROC: an alphabet soup.
He X; Frey E
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Sep; 6(9):652-5. PubMed ID: 19720362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data.
Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 1989; 16(4):561-8. PubMed ID: 2770630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Incorporating utility-weights when comparing two diagnostic systems: a preliminary assessment.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2005 Oct; 12(10):1293-300. PubMed ID: 16179206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model.
Edwards DC; Kupinski MA; Metz CE; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2002 Dec; 29(12):2861-70. PubMed ID: 12512721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. ROC and LROC analyses of the effects of lesion contrast, size, and signal-to-noise ratio on detectability in PET images.
Farquhar TH; Llacer J; Sayre J; Tai YC; Hoffman EJ
J Nucl Med; 2000 Apr; 41(4):745-54. PubMed ID: 10768578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Decision strategies that maximize the area under the LROC curve.
Khurd P; Gindi G
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Dec; 24(12):1626-36. PubMed ID: 16353373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review.
Wagner RF; Metz CE; Campbell G
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):723-48. PubMed ID: 17502262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of likelihood ratios for comparisons of binary diagnostic tests: underlying ROC curves.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5821-30. PubMed ID: 21158294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Recent advances in observer performance methodology: jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC).
Chakraborty DP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):26-31. PubMed ID: 15933077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.
Zanca F; Hillis SL; Claus F; Van Ongeval C; Celis V; Provoost V; Yoon HJ; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5917-29. PubMed ID: 23039631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimization of restricted ROC surfaces in three-class classification tasks.
Edwards DC; Metz CE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1345-56. PubMed ID: 17948725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Basic concepts and development of an all-purpose computer interface for ROC/FROC observer study.
Shiraishi J; Fukuoka D; Hara T; Abe H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jan; 6(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22763658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. ROC and localization ROC analyses of lesion detection in whole-body FDG PET: effects of acquisition mode, attenuation correction and reconstruction algorithm.
Farquhar TH; Llacer J; Hoh CK; Czernin J; Gambhir SS; Seltzer MA; Silverman DH; Qi J; Hsu C; Hoffman EJ
J Nucl Med; 1999 Dec; 40(12):2043-52. PubMed ID: 10616885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reader variability in mammography and its implications for expected utility over the population of readers and cases.
Wagner RF; Beam CA; Beiden SV
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(6):561-72. PubMed ID: 15534338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Shannon information and ROC analysis in imaging.
Clarkson E; Cushing JB
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2015 Jul; 32(7):1288-301. PubMed ID: 26367158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Statistical comparison of ROC curves from multiple readers.
Swaving M; van Houwelingen H; Ottes FP; Steerneman T
Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 8778532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Estimating the relative utility of screening mammography.
Abbey CK; Eckstein MP; Boone JM
Med Decis Making; 2013 May; 33(4):510-20. PubMed ID: 23295543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
