223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24320445)
21. Impact of super-resolution and image acquisition on the detection of calcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Barufaldi B; Acciavatti RJ; Conant EF; Maidment ADA
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):193-203. PubMed ID: 37572187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cascaded systems analysis of shift-variant image quality in slit-scanning breast tomosynthesis.
Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4392-4401. PubMed ID: 30091470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multigrid reconstruction with block-iterative updates for breast tomosynthesis.
Michielsen K; Nuyts J
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6537-48. PubMed ID: 26520744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of back projection methods for breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction.
Zhou W; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25384538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6003-14. PubMed ID: 21158312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Super-Resolution in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Limitations of the Conventional System Design and Strategies for Optimization.
Acciavatti RJ; Vent TL; Barufaldi B; Wileyto EP; Noël PB; Maidment ADA
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2020 May; 11513():. PubMed ID: 37842133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Proposing Rapid Source Pulsing for Improved Super-Resolution in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Acciavatti RJ; Vent TL; Barufaldi B; Wileyto EP; Noël PB; Maidment ADA
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2020 Feb; 11312():. PubMed ID: 37927528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Stationary computed tomography with source and detector in linear symmetric geometry: Direct filtered backprojection reconstruction.
Zhang T; Xing Y; Zhang L; Jin X; Gao H; Chen Z
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2222-2236. PubMed ID: 32009236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A fast, angle-dependent, analytical model of CsI detector response for optimization of 3D x-ray breast imaging systems.
Freed M; Park S; Badano A
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2593-605. PubMed ID: 20632571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers.
Van de Sompel D; Brady SM; Boone J
Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 20713313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Achieving Isotropic Super-Resolution with a Non-Isocentric Acquisition Geometry in a Next-Generation Tomosynthesis System.
Acciavatti RJ; Choi CJ; Vent TL; Barufaldi B; Maidment ADA
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2022; 12031():. PubMed ID: 37692411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Digital tomosynthesis: technique.
Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 24792651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A three-dimensional-weighted cone beam filtered backprojection (CB-FBP) algorithm for image reconstruction in volumetric CT-helical scanning.
Tang X; Hsieh J; Nilsen RA; Dutta S; Samsonov D; Hagiwara A
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(4):855-74. PubMed ID: 16467583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.
Wu T; Moore RH; Rafferty EA; Kopans DB
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2636-47. PubMed ID: 15487747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of ray profile modeling on resolution recovery in clinical CT.
Hofmann C; Knaup M; Kachelrieß M
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021907. PubMed ID: 24506628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Full-field breast tomosynthesis.
Smith A
Radiol Manage; 2005; 27(5):25-31. PubMed ID: 16294583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The Influence on Image Reconstruction Methods on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Guided Vacuum-assisted Biopsy for Clustered Microcalcifications].
Kuwabara N; Asano S; Kawashima H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022; 78(2):180-187. PubMed ID: 35185097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
