133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24320453)
1. Dose equations for tube current modulation in CT scanning and the interpretation of the associated CTDIvol.
Dixon RL; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111920. PubMed ID: 24320453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose equations for shift-variant CT acquisition modes using variable pitch, tube current, and aperture, and the meaning of their associated CTDI(vol).
Dixon RL; Boone JM; Kraft RA
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111906. PubMed ID: 25370639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analytical equations for CT dose profiles derived using a scatter kernel of Monte Carlo parentage with broad applicability to CT dosimetry problems.
Dixon RL; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4251-64. PubMed ID: 21859027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The feasibility of a regional CTDIvol to estimate organ dose from tube current modulated CT exams.
Khatonabadi M; Kim HJ; Lu P; McMillan KL; Cagnon CH; DeMarco JJ; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051903. PubMed ID: 23635273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do we need 3D tube current modulation information for accurate organ dosimetry in chest CT? Protocols dose comparisons.
Lopez-Rendon X; Zhang G; Coudyzer W; Develter W; Bosmans H; Zanca F
Eur Radiol; 2017 Nov; 27(11):4490-4497. PubMed ID: 28526893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early first-trimester fetal radiation dose estimation in 16-MDCT without and with automated tube current modulation.
Jaffe TA; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva GI; Nguyen G; Hurwitz LM; Nelson RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):860-4. PubMed ID: 18356429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the image quality of various fixed and dose modulated protocols for soft tissue neck CT on a GE Lightspeed scanner.
Weidemann J; Stamm G; Galanski M; Keberle M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):473-7. PubMed ID: 18182264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of radiation dose from tube current modulated CT examinations with considerations of both patient size and variable tube current.
Li X; Yang K; Liu B
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5413-5422. PubMed ID: 28681439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visualization and comparison of CT dose distribution between axial and helical acquisitions.
Yang K; Li X; Yu L; Li B; Marschall TA; Liu B
Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 50(8):4797-4808. PubMed ID: 37283112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A database for estimating organ dose for coronary angiography and brain perfusion CT scans for arbitrary spectra and angular tube current modulation.
Rupcich F; Badal A; Kyprianou I; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5336-46. PubMed ID: 22957601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paediatric CT exposures: comparison between CTDI vol and SSDE methods using measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.
Figueira C; Di Maria S; Baptista M; Mendes M; Madeira P; Vaz P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):210-5. PubMed ID: 25883302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of the weighted CTDI(∞) for multislice CT examinations.
Li X; Zhang D; Liu B
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):901-5. PubMed ID: 22320799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of patient positioning when interpreting CT dose metrics: A phantom study.
Marsh RM; Silosky MS
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1514-1524. PubMed ID: 28133763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of multislice computed tomography dose index (CTDI) using optically stimulated luminescence technology.
Ruan C; Yukihara EG; Clouse WJ; Gasparian PB; Ahmad S
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3560-8. PubMed ID: 20831063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between radiographic techniques (kilovolt and milliampere-second) and CTDI(VOL).
Elojeimy S; Tipnis S; Huda W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Sep; 141(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 20406742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.
Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography.
van Straten M; Deak P; Shrimpton PC; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4881-9. PubMed ID: 19994496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetry concepts for scanner quality assurance and tissue dose assessment in micro-CT.
Hupfer M; Kolditz D; Nowak T; Eisa F; Brauweiler R; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):658-70. PubMed ID: 22320775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
