These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24320453)

  • 21. On the use of Monte Carlo-derived dosimetric data in the estimation of patient dose from CT examinations.
    Perisinakis K; Tzedakis A; Damilakis J
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2018-28. PubMed ID: 18561678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations.
    Tzedakis A; Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Stratakis J; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1621-9. PubMed ID: 16013721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Extraction of tube current values from DICOM CT images for patient dose estimation.
    Lin PJ; Kubo T; Krishnapillai R
    Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2951-5. PubMed ID: 20632607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scan region and organ doses in computed tomography.
    He W; Marzolf SA; Tipnis S; Huda W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Mar; 148(4):444-51. PubMed ID: 21561946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dose reduction for abdominal and pelvic MDCT after change to graduated weight-based protocol for selecting quality reference tube current, peak kilovoltage, and slice collimation.
    Herts BR; Baker ME; Obuchowski N; Primak A; Schneider E; Rhana H; Dong F
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):1298-303. PubMed ID: 23701068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adult abdomen-pelvis CT: Does equilibrium dose-pitch product better account for the kVp dependence of organ dose than conventional CTDI?
    Li X; Morgan AG; Liptak CL; Muryn JS; Dong FF; Primak AN; Segars WP
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6258-68. PubMed ID: 26520718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
    Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Concepts for dose determination in flat-detector CT.
    Kyriakou Y; Deak P; Langner O; Kalender WA
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3551-66. PubMed ID: 18552416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of CT automatic tube current modulation on uncertainty in effective dose.
    Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jan; 168(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 25628455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of a combined tube current modulation system on dose delivered to patients undergoing thoracic and abdominal CT with a 128-slice scanner.
    Stratis A; Kottou S; Molfetas M; Xirafi I; Delis H; Panayiotakis G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 23173217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Early first trimester fetal dose estimation method in a multivendor study of 16- and 64-MDCT scanners and low-dose imaging protocols.
    Jaffe TA; Neville AM; Anderson-Evans C; Long S; Lowry C; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1019-24. PubMed ID: 19770324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dosimetry methods for multi-detector computed tomography.
    Gancheva M; Dyakov I; Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Taseva D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):190-3. PubMed ID: 25889607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Monte Carlo simulations to assess the effects of tube current modulation on breast dose for multidetector CT.
    Angel E; Yaghmai N; Jude CM; Demarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Goldin JG; Primak AN; Stevens DM; Cody DD; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):497-512. PubMed ID: 19124953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experimental estimates of peak skin dose and its relationship to the CT dose index using the CTDI head phantom.
    de las Heras H; Minniti R; Wilson S; Mitchell C; Skopec M; Brunner CC; Chakrabarti K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 23864642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Deterministic absorbed dose estimation in computed tomography using a discrete ordinates method.
    Norris ET; Liu X; Hsieh J
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4080-7. PubMed ID: 26133608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiation dose calculations for CT scans with tube current modulation using the approach to equilibrium function.
    Li X; Zhang D; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111910. PubMed ID: 25370643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A method for calculating the dose length product from CT DICOM images.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Metallidis SI
    Br J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 84(999):236-43. PubMed ID: 21081566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automated framework for digital radiation dose index reporting from CT dose reports.
    Shih G; Lu ZF; Zabih R; Kennedy D; Loftus M; Shih WJ; Osborne J; Nickoloff E; Schwartz L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):1170-4. PubMed ID: 22021511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Embryo dose estimates in body CT.
    Huda W; Randazzo W; Tipnis S; Frey GD; Mah E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):874-80. PubMed ID: 20308485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dose conversion coefficients for paediatric CT examinations with automatic tube current modulation.
    Schlattl H; Zankl M; Becker J; Hoeschen C
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 57(20):6309-26. PubMed ID: 22990300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.