684 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24320505)
1. Experimental validation of the TOPAS Monte Carlo system for passive scattering proton therapy.
Testa M; Schümann J; Lu HM; Shin J; Faddegon B; Perl J; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121719. PubMed ID: 24320505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Independent dose verification system with Monte Carlo simulations using TOPAS for passive scattering proton therapy at the National Cancer Center in Korea.
Shin WG; Testa M; Kim HS; Jeong JH; Lee SB; Kim YJ; Min CH
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7598-7616. PubMed ID: 28809759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo simulation-based patient-specific QA using machine log files for line-scanning proton radiation therapy.
Jeon C; Lee J; Shin J; Cheon W; Ahn S; Jo K; Han Y
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7139-7153. PubMed ID: 37756652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Huang S; Kang M; Souris K; Ainsley C; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):558-572. PubMed ID: 30058170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.
Perl J; Shin J; Schumann J; Faddegon B; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6818-37. PubMed ID: 23127075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and validation of the Dynamic Collimation Monte Carlo simulation package for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Nelson NP; Culberson WS; Hyer DE; Geoghegan TJ; Patwardhan KA; Smith BR; Flynn RT; Yu J; Rana S; Gutiérrez AN; Hill PM
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3172-3185. PubMed ID: 33740253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accurate Monte Carlo simulations for nozzle design, commissioning and quality assurance for a proton radiation therapy facility.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Lee SY; Kooy HM
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2107-18. PubMed ID: 15305464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Producing a Beam Model of the Varian ProBeam Proton Therapy System using TOPAS Monte Carlo Toolkit.
Rahman M; Bruza P; Lin Y; Gladstone DJ; Pogue BW; Zhang R
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6500-6508. PubMed ID: 33030241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single pencil beam benchmark of a module for Monte Carlo simulation of proton transport in the PENELOPE code.
Verbeek N; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Smyczek S; Timmermann B; Brualla L
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):456-476. PubMed ID: 33217026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spread-out Bragg peak proton FLASH irradiation using a clinical synchrocyclotron: Proof of concept and ion chamber characterization.
Darafsheh A; Hao Y; Zhao X; Zwart T; Wagner M; Evans T; Reynoso F; Zhao T
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4472-4484. PubMed ID: 34077590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extended in-field and out-of-field validation of a compact Monte Carlo model of an IBA PROTEUS
Colson D; Blommaert J; Poels K; De Saint-Hubert M; Reniers B; Depuydt T
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(21):. PubMed ID: 37844576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. TOPAS Monte Carlo simulation for double scattering proton therapy and dosimetric evaluation.
Liu H; Li Z; Slopsema R; Hong L; Pei X; Xu XG
Phys Med; 2019 Jun; 62():53-62. PubMed ID: 31153399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
Lin L; Huang S; Kang M; Hiltunen P; Vanderstraeten R; Lindberg J; Siljamaki S; Wareing T; Davis I; Barnett A; McGhee J; Simone CB; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Ainsley C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):44-49. PubMed ID: 28300385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. TOPAS Simulation of the Mevion S250 compact proton therapy unit.
Prusator M; Ahmad S; Chen Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 May; 18(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 28444840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental depth dose curves of a 67.5 MeV proton beam for benchmarking and validation of Monte Carlo simulation.
Faddegon BA; Shin J; Castenada CM; Ramos-Méndez J; Daftari IK
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4199-210. PubMed ID: 26133619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a Monte Carlo model for multi leaf collimator based electron delivery.
Kaluarachchi MM; Saleh ZH; Schwer ML; Klein EE
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3586-3599. PubMed ID: 32324289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of GATE-RTion (GATE/Geant4) Monte Carlo simulation settings for proton pencil beam scanning quality assurance.
Winterhalter C; Taylor M; Boersma D; Elia A; Guatelli S; Mackay R; Kirkby K; Maigne L; Ivanchenko V; Resch AF; Sarrut D; Sitch P; Vidal M; Grevillot L; Aitkenhead A
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5817-5828. PubMed ID: 32967037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Geometrical splitting technique to improve the computational efficiency in Monte Carlo calculations for proton therapy.
Ramos-Méndez J; Perl J; Faddegon B; Schümann J; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041718. PubMed ID: 23556888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monte Carlo simulation of conical collimators for stereotactic radiosurgery with a 6 MV flattening-filter-free photon beam.
Hermida-López M; Sánchez-Artuñedo D; Rodríguez M; Brualla L
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3160-3171. PubMed ID: 33715167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
