These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24320529)
1. Application of the optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) technique for mouse dosimetry in micro-CT imaging. Vrigneaud JM; Courteau A; Ranouil J; Morgand L; Raguin O; Walker P; Oudot A; Collin B; Brunotte F Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):122102. PubMed ID: 24320529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of multislice computed tomography dose index (CTDI) using optically stimulated luminescence technology. Ruan C; Yukihara EG; Clouse WJ; Gasparian PB; Ahmad S Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3560-8. PubMed ID: 20831063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characteristics of an OSLD in the diagnostic energy range. Al-Senan RM; Hatab MR Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4396-405. PubMed ID: 21859040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo dosimetry with optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, compared to diodes; the effects of buildup cap thickness and fabrication material. Jursinic PA; Yahnke CJ Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5432-40. PubMed ID: 21992362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technical note: precision and accuracy of a commercially available CT optically stimulated luminescent dosimetry system for the measurement of CT dose index. Vrieze TJ; Sturchio GM; McCollough CH Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6580-4. PubMed ID: 23127052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetry concepts for scanner quality assurance and tissue dose assessment in micro-CT. Hupfer M; Kolditz D; Nowak T; Eisa F; Brauweiler R; Kalender WA Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):658-70. PubMed ID: 22320775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions. Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An optically stimulated luminescence system to measure dose profiles in x-ray computed tomography. Yukihara EG; Ruan C; Gasparian PB; Clouse WJ; Kalavagunta C; Ahmad S Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6337-52. PubMed ID: 19809126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of a commercially-available, optically-stimulated luminescent dosimetry system for use in computed tomography. Lavoie L; Ghita M; Brateman L; Arreola M Health Phys; 2011 Sep; 101(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 21799346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization and implementation of OSL dosimeters for use in evaluating the efficacy of organ-based tube current modulation for CT scans of the face and orbits. Marsh RM; Silosky M Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1730-8. PubMed ID: 25832062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative dose evaluations between XVI and OBI cone beam CT systems using Gafchromic XRQA2 film and nanoDot optical stimulated luminescence dosimeters. Giaddui T; Cui Y; Galvin J; Yu Y; Xiao Y Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):062102. PubMed ID: 23718600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols. Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation dose measurements of an on-board imager X-ray unit using optically-stimulated luminescence dosimeters. Smith L; Haque M; Morales J; Hill R Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Dec; 38(4):665-9. PubMed ID: 26482528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms. DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of OSLD and a treatment planning system for surface dose determination in IMRT treatments. Zhuang AH; Olch AJ Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081720. PubMed ID: 25086530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Female breast, lung, and pelvic organ radiation from dose-reduced 64-MDCT thoracic examination protocols: a phantom study. Litmanovich D; Tack D; Lin PJ; Boiselle PM; Raptopoulos V; Bankier AA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):929-34. PubMed ID: 21940581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence detectors and high-sensitivity MCP-N thermoluminescent detectors in the 40-300 kVp energy range. Poirier Y; Kuznetsova S; Villarreal-Barajas JE Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):402-413. PubMed ID: 29164632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calibration and error analysis of metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimeters for computed tomography radiation dosimetry. Trattner S; Prinsen P; Wiegert J; Gerland EL; Shefer E; Morton T; Thompson CM; Yagil Y; Cheng B; Jambawalikar S; Al-Senan R; Amurao M; Halliburton SS; Einstein AJ Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6589-6602. PubMed ID: 28940306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo simulations of the dose from imaging with GE eXplore 120 micro-CT using GATE. Bretin F; Bahri MA; Luxen A; Phillips C; Plenevaux A; Seret A Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5711-9. PubMed ID: 26429245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical Note: Development of a phantom for dosimetric comparison of murine micro-CT protocols with optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters. Mendez C; Colpo N; Duzenli C; Atwal P; Gill B Med Phys; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 29971794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]