BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24320533)

  • 1. Automated fibroglandular tissue segmentation and volumetric density estimation in breast MRI using an atlas-aided fuzzy C-means method.
    Wu S; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):122302. PubMed ID: 24320533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using deep learning to segment breast and fibroglandular tissue in MRI volumes.
    Dalmış MU; Litjens G; Holland K; Setio A; Mann R; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):533-546. PubMed ID: 28035663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated chest wall line detection for whole-breast segmentation in sagittal breast MR images.
    Wu S; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):042301. PubMed ID: 23556914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new bias field correction method combining N3 and FCM for improved segmentation of breast density on MRI.
    Lin M; Chan S; Chen JH; Chang D; Nie K; Chen ST; Lin CJ; Shih TC; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
    Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 21361169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Segmentation of whole breast and fibroglandular tissue using nnU-Net in dynamic contrast enhanced MR images.
    Huo L; Hu X; Xiao Q; Gu Y; Chu X; Jiang L
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Oct; 82():31-41. PubMed ID: 34147598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fully automated segmentation of whole breast using dynamic programming in dynamic contrast enhanced MR images.
    Jiang L; Hu X; Xiao Q; Gu Y; Li Q
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2400-2414. PubMed ID: 28375584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated fibroglandular tissue segmentation in breast MRI using generative adversarial networks.
    Ma X; Wang J; Zheng X; Liu Z; Long W; Zhang Y; Wei J; Lu Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(10):105006. PubMed ID: 32155611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.
    Keller BM; Nathan DL; Wang Y; Zheng Y; Gee JC; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4903-17. PubMed ID: 22894417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Atlas-based probabilistic fibroglandular tissue segmentation in breast MRI.
    Wu S; Weinstein S; Kontos D
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 2):437-45. PubMed ID: 23286078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of 3-point Dixon imaging and fuzzy C-means clustering methods for breast density measurement.
    Clendenen TV; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A; Moy L; Pike MC; Rusinek H; Kim S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):474-81. PubMed ID: 23292922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment response assessment of breast masses on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance scans using fuzzy c-means clustering and level set segmentation.
    Shi J; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie M; Chenevert T
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5052-63. PubMed ID: 19994516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical applicability and relevance of fibroglandular tissue segmentation on routine T1 weighted breast MRI.
    Pujara AC; Mikheev A; Rusinek H; Rallapalli H; Walczyk J; Gao Y; Chhor C; Pysarenko K; Babb JS; Melsaether AN
    Clin Imaging; 2017; 42():119-125. PubMed ID: 27951458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fully automatic quantification of fibroglandular tissue and background parenchymal enhancement with accurate implementation for axial and sagittal breast MRI protocols.
    Wei D; Jahani N; Cohen E; Weinstein S; Hsieh MK; Pantalone L; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):238-252. PubMed ID: 33150617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: a postmortem study.
    Ding H; Johnson T; Lin M; Le HQ; Ducote JL; Su MY; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):122305. PubMed ID: 24320536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative Volumetric K-Means Cluster Segmentation of Fibroglandular Tissue and Skin in Breast MRI.
    Niukkanen A; Arponen O; Nykänen A; Masarwah A; Sutela A; Liimatainen T; Vanninen R; Sudah M
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):425-434. PubMed ID: 29047034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic Breast and Fibroglandular Tissue Segmentation in Breast MRI Using Deep Learning by a Fully-Convolutional Residual Neural Network U-Net.
    Zhang Y; Chen JH; Chang KT; Park VY; Kim MJ; Chan S; Chang P; Chow D; Luk A; Kwong T; Su MY
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Nov; 26(11):1526-1535. PubMed ID: 30713130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spectral embedding based active contour (SEAC) for lesion segmentation on breast dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Agner SC; Xu J; Madabhushi A
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):032305. PubMed ID: 23464337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Knowledge-based and deep learning-based automated chest wall segmentation in magnetic resonance images of extremely dense breasts.
    Verburg E; Wolterink JM; de Waard SN; Išgum I; van Gils CH; Veldhuis WB; Gilhuijs KGA
    Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4405-4416. PubMed ID: 31274194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of BI-RADS-based subjective visual estimation of amount of fibroglandular breast tissue with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison to automated quantitative assessment.
    Wengert GJ; Helbich TH; Woitek R; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Baltzer PA; Vogl WD; Weber M; Meyer-Baese A; Pinker K
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):3917-3922. PubMed ID: 27108300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.