These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24320903)

  • 1. Micro-computerized tomography assessment of fluorescence aided caries excavation (FACE) technology: comparison with three other caries removal techniques.
    Zhang X; Tu R; Yin W; Zhou X; Li X; Hu D
    Aust Dent J; 2013 Dec; 58(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 24320903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Caries-removal effectiveness and minimal-invasiveness potential of caries-excavation techniques: a micro-CT investigation.
    Neves Ade A; Coutinho E; De Munck J; Van Meerbeek B
    J Dent; 2011 Feb; 39(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 21111770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation and Comparison of Caries Excavation Efficacy of Three Different Burs: A Micro-computed Tomographic-assisted Study.
    Vusurumarthi V; Ballullaya SV; Pushpa S; Veluvarti VRK; Loka PR; Galla PK
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2020; 10(2):213-219. PubMed ID: 32670911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MicroCT-based comparison between fluorescence-aided caries excavation and conventional excavation.
    Lai G; Kaisarly D; Xu X; Kunzelmann KH
    Am J Dent; 2014 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 24902399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. X-ray microtomography study to validate the efficacies of caries removal in primary molars by hand excavation and chemo-mechanical technique.
    Ahmed M; Davis GR; Wong FS
    Caries Res; 2012; 46(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 22922542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital image analysis method to assess the performance of conventional and self-limiting concepts in dentine caries removal.
    Toledano M; Ghinea R; Cardona JC; Cabello I; Yamauti M; Pérez MM; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41 Suppl 3():e31-8. PubMed ID: 23507398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of Different Mechanical Methods on Dentin Caries Removal: Micro-CT and Digital Image Evaluation.
    Ferraz C; Freire AR; Mendonça JS; Fernandes CA; Cardona JC; Yamauti M
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 25575196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of five alternative methods of carious dentine excavation.
    Banerjee A; Kidd EA; Watson TF
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 10773632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantity of remaining bacteria and cavity size after excavation with FACE, caries detector dye and conventional excavation in vitro.
    Lennon AM; Attin T; Buchalla W
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 17555174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fluorescence-aided caries excavation (FACE), caries detector, and conventional caries excavation in primary teeth.
    Lennon AM; Attin T; Martens S; Buchalla W
    Pediatr Dent; 2009; 31(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 19722440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the efficiency of caries removal using an Er:YAG laser driven by fluorescence feedback control.
    Schwass DR; Leichter JW; Purton DG; Swain MV
    Arch Oral Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(6):603-10. PubMed ID: 23123070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of four dentine excavation methods in deciduous teeth.
    Celiberti P; Francescut P; Lussi A
    Caries Res; 2006; 40(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16508268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemical, morphological and microhardness changes of dentine after chemomechanical caries removal.
    Hamama HH; Yiu CK; Burrow MF; King NM
    Aust Dent J; 2013 Sep; 58(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 23981208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficiency of 4 caries excavation methods compared.
    Lennon AM; Buchalla W; Rassner B; Becker K; Attin T
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 17024942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does DIAGNOdent provide a reliable caries-removal endpoint?
    Neves AA; Coutinho E; De Munck J; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 21334416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical randomized controlled trial of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv).
    Lozano-Chourio MA; Zambrano O; González H; Quero M
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2006 May; 16(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 16643536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Micro-CT based quantitative evaluation of caries excavation.
    Neves Ade A; Coutinho E; Vivan Cardoso M; Jaecques SV; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):579-88. PubMed ID: 20347481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fluorescence of primary dentine after chemomechanical and conventional rotary excavation.
    Corrêa FN; Rocha RO; Soares FZ; Rodrigues-Filho LE; Rodrigues CR
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 9(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 18793594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv) with that of conventional excavation in reducing the cariogenic flora.
    Azrak B; Callaway A; Grundheber A; Stender E; Willershausen B
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2004 May; 14(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 15139953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv or conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth in vitro.
    Flückiger L; Waltimo T; Stich H; Lussi A
    J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 15683888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.