These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24320992)

  • 1. The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on the predictive values of results from meta-analyses.
    Melsen WG; Bootsma MC; Rovers MM; Bonten MJ
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 24320992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics.
    Bowden J; Tierney JF; Copas AJ; Burdett S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Apr; 11():41. PubMed ID: 21473747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analysis of prevalence: I
    Migliavaca CB; Stein C; Colpani V; Barker TH; Ziegelmann PK; Munn Z; Falavigna M;
    Res Synth Methods; 2022 May; 13(3):363-367. PubMed ID: 35088937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistics for quantifying heterogeneity in univariate and bivariate meta-analyses of binary data: the case of meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.
    Zhou Y; Dendukuri N
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(16):2701-17. PubMed ID: 24903142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bivariate meta-analysis of predictive values of diagnostic tests can be an alternative to bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity.
    Leeflang MM; Deeks JJ; Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 65(10):1088-97. PubMed ID: 22742916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.
    Higgins JP; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1539-58. PubMed ID: 12111919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical Primer: heterogeneity, random- or fixed-effects model analyses?
    Barili F; Parolari A; Kappetein PA; Freemantle N
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Sep; 27(3):317-321. PubMed ID: 29868857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses.
    Jackson D; White IR; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):3805-20. PubMed ID: 22763950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Approaches to heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Petitti DB
    Stat Med; 2001 Dec; 20(23):3625-33. PubMed ID: 11746342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new measure of between-studies heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Crippa A; Khudyakov P; Wang M; Orsini N; Spiegelman D
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(21):3661-75. PubMed ID: 27161124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of old and new tests of heterogeneity in epidemiologic meta-analysis.
    Takkouche B; Cadarso-Suárez C; Spiegelman D
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Jul; 150(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 10412966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simple technique investigating baseline heterogeneity helped to eliminate potential bias in meta-analyses.
    Hicks A; Fairhurst C; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():55-62. PubMed ID: 29032245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Application of Stata software to test heterogeneity in meta-analysis method].
    Wang D; Mou ZY; Zhai JX; Zong HX; Zhao XD
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 29(7):726-9. PubMed ID: 19031771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heterogeneity in ecological and evolutionary meta-analyses: its magnitude and implications.
    Senior AM; Grueber CE; Kamiya T; Lagisz M; O'Dwyer K; Santos ES; Nakagawa S
    Ecology; 2016 Dec; 97(12):3293-3299. PubMed ID: 27912008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries.
    Graham PL; Moran JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 22265586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Problems caused by heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a case study of acupuncture trials.
    Prady SL; Burch J; Crouch S; MacPherson H
    Acupunct Med; 2014 Feb; 32(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 24140758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simulation study comparing properties of heterogeneity measures in meta-analyses.
    Mittlböck M; Heinzl H
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4321-33. PubMed ID: 16991104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dealing with clinical heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Assumptions, methods, interpretation.
    Kriston L
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2013 Mar; 22(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 23494781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.