These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24321246)

  • 1. Estimation of between-trial variance in sequential meta-analyses: a simulation study.
    Novianti PW; Roes KC; van der Tweel I
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2014 Jan; 37(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 24321246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of 20 heterogeneity variance estimators in statistical synthesis of results from studies: a simulation study.
    Petropoulou M; Mavridis D
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(27):4266-4280. PubMed ID: 28815652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multistep estimators of the between-study variance: The relationship with the Paule-Mandel estimator.
    van Aert RCM; Jackson D
    Stat Med; 2018 Jul; 37(17):2616-2629. PubMed ID: 29700839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of heterogeneity and heterogeneity interval estimators in random-effects meta-analysis of the standardized mean difference in education and psychology.
    Boedeker P; Henson RK
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Jun; 25(3):346-364. PubMed ID: 31599614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of statistical inferences from the DerSimonian-Laird and alternative random-effects model meta-analyses - an empirical assessment of 920 Cochrane primary outcome meta-analyses.
    Thorlund K; Wetterslev J; Awad T; Thabane L; Gluud C
    Res Synth Methods; 2011 Dec; 2(4):238-53. PubMed ID: 26061888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Jun; 8(2):181-198. PubMed ID: 27060925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of methods for meta-analysis of a small number of studies with binary outcomes.
    Mathes T; Kuss O
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):366-381. PubMed ID: 29573180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A note on the empirical Bayes heterogeneity variance estimator in meta-analysis.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(20):3804-3816. PubMed ID: 31209917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation in meta-analyses of mean difference and standardized mean difference.
    Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
    Stat Med; 2020 Jan; 39(2):171-191. PubMed ID: 31709582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Viechtbauer W; Bender R; Bowden J; Knapp G; Kuss O; Higgins JP; Langan D; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):55-79. PubMed ID: 26332144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Paule-Mandel estimators for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
    Jackson D; Veroniki AA; Law M; Tricco AC; Baker R
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):416-434. PubMed ID: 28585257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multistep estimators of the between-study covariance matrix under the multivariate random-effects model for meta-analysis.
    Jackson D; Viechtbauer W; van Aert RCM
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(4):756-773. PubMed ID: 38110725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian estimation in random effects meta-analysis using a non-informative prior.
    Bodnar O; Link A; Arendacká B; Possolo A; Elster C
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):378-399. PubMed ID: 27790722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A note on variance estimation in random effects meta-regression.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):823-38. PubMed ID: 16078388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An empirical comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in 12 894 meta-analyses.
    Langan D; Higgins JP; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 26053175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heterogeneity estimates in a biased world.
    Hönekopp J; Linden AH
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0262809. PubMed ID: 35113897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios.
    Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):426-442. PubMed ID: 32112619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An application of targeted maximum likelihood estimation to the meta-analysis of safety data.
    Gruber S; van der Laan MJ
    Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):254-62. PubMed ID: 23379761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.