BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24323560)

  • 1. Physician communication in a lung cancer center--does the message come across?
    Nehls W; Gabrijel S; Kiss A; Kollmeier J; Schmalz O; Albrecht H; Behr J; Bauer TT
    Pneumologie; 2013 Dec; 67(12):688-93. PubMed ID: 24323560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Receiving the diagnosis of lung cancer: patient recall of information and satisfaction with physician communication.
    Gabrijel S; Grize L; Helfenstein E; Brutsche M; Grossman P; Tamm M; Kiss A
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 26(2):297-302. PubMed ID: 18182671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of satisfaction with the communication process during consultation of cancer patients with potentially curable disease, cancer patients on palliative care, and HIV-positive patients.
    Petrasch S; Bauer M; Reinacher-Schick A; Sandmann M; Kissler M; Küchler T; Krüskemper G; Dörr T; Schmiegel W
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1998; 148(21):491-9. PubMed ID: 10048178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disclosing the cancer diagnosis: what contributes to patient satisfaction?
    Geiser F; Bijani J; Imbierowicz K; Conrad R; Liedtke R; Schild H; Schüller H
    Onkologie; 2006 Nov; 29(11):509-13. PubMed ID: 17068385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient information in radiooncology results of a patient survey.
    Schäfer C; Dietl B; Putnik K; Altmann D; Marienhagen J; Herbst M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2002 Oct; 178(10):562-71. PubMed ID: 12386788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Communication before Cancer Surgery - the Perspective of Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer.
    Huebner J; Keinki C; Kleeberg J; Seilacher E
    Oncol Res Treat; 2016; 39(11):724-727. PubMed ID: 27855378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving patient-provider communication for patients having surgery: patient perceptions of a revised health literacy-based consent process.
    Miller MJ; Abrams MA; Earles B; Phillips K; McCleeary EM
    J Patient Saf; 2011 Mar; 7(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 21921865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgeon-patient communication in oncology.
    Wagner JY; Wuensch A; Friess H; Berberat PO
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2014 Sep; 23(5):585-93. PubMed ID: 24393204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving informed consent of surgical patients using a multimedia-based program? Results of a prospective randomized multicenter study of patients before cholecystectomy.
    Bollschweiler E; Apitzsch J; Obliers R; Koerfer A; Mönig SP; Metzger R; Hölscher AH
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 18650629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health literacy in an orthopedic trauma patient population: a cross-sectional survey of patient comprehension.
    Kadakia RJ; Tsahakis JM; Issar NM; Archer KR; Jahangir AA; Sethi MK; Obremskey WT; Mir HR
    J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Aug; 27(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 23114414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient-physician communication: informed consent for imaging-guided spinal injections.
    Bennett DL; Dharia CV; Ferguson KJ; Okon AE
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jan; 6(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 19111270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Information seeking and satisfaction with physician-patient communication among prostate cancer survivors.
    Cegala DJ; Bahnson RR; Clinton SK; David P; Gong MC; Monk JP; Nag S; Pohar KS
    Health Commun; 2008; 23(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 18443993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Communicating cancer diagnosis and prognosis: when the target is the elderly patient-a GIOGer study.
    Repetto L; Piselli P; Raffaele M; Locatelli C;
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Feb; 45(3):374-83. PubMed ID: 18838268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improvement of the educational process by computer-based visualization of procedures: randomized controlled trial.
    Enzenhofer M; Bludau HB; Komm N; Wild B; Mueller K; Herzog W; Hochlehnert A
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Jun; 6(2):e16. PubMed ID: 15249265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patients' perceptions of physicians communication and outcomes of the accrual to trial process.
    Grant CH; Cissna KN; Rosenfeld LB
    Health Commun; 2000; 12(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 10938905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finding the right interactional temperature: do colder patients need more warmth in physician communication style?
    Cousin G; Schmid Mast M; Jaunin-Stalder N
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Dec; 98():18-23. PubMed ID: 24331877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A physician-directed intervention: teaching and measuring better informed consent.
    Yap TY; Yamokoski A; Noll R; Drotar D; Zyzanski S; Kodish ED;
    Acad Med; 2009 Aug; 84(8):1036-42. PubMed ID: 19638769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Both patients and physicians benefit from internet-based communication (APIKAP study)].
    Gersch C; Ebel M
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2014 Jul; 156 Suppl 2():31-8. PubMed ID: 25351025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of interval between diagnosis and time of survey upon preferred information format for prostate cancer patients.
    Sharpley CF; Christie DR
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Apr; 53(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 19527371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How well informed are patients when leaving the emergency department? comparing information provided and information retained.
    Marty H; Bogenstätter Y; Franc G; Tschan F; Zimmermann H
    Emerg Med J; 2013 Jan; 30(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 22411594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.