244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24324288)
1. Risk of preterm delivery associated with prior treatment of cervical precancerous lesion according to the depth of the cone.
Berretta R; Gizzo S; Dall'Asta A; Mazzone E; Monica M; Franchi L; Peri F; Patrelli TS; Bacchi Modena A
Dis Markers; 2013; 35(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 24324288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kyrgiou M; Athanasiou A; Paraskevaidi M; Mitra A; Kalliala I; Martin-Hirsch P; Arbyn M; Bennett P; Paraskevaidis E
BMJ; 2016 Jul; 354():i3633. PubMed ID: 27469988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation: A 2nd retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital.
van Velthoven K; Poppe W; Verschuere H; Arbyn M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Sep; 216():224-231. PubMed ID: 28822944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical conization and the risk of preterm delivery.
Bevis KS; Biggio JR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 205(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 21345402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adverse obstetrical outcomes after treatment of precancerous cervical lesions: a Belgian multicentre study.
Simoens C; Goffin F; Simon P; Barlow P; Antoine J; Foidart JM; Arbyn M
BJOG; 2012 Sep; 119(10):1247-55. PubMed ID: 22804838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes after conization in 80 women. Preliminary data.
Patrelli TS; Anfuso S; Vandi F; Valitutto S; Migliore M; Salvati MA; De Ioris A; Condemi V; Fadda GM; Bacchi Modena A; Nardelli GB
Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Aug; 60(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 18560344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pregnancy following cervical conization.
Buller RE; Jones HW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Mar; 142(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 7058852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of occult endocervical glandular dysplasia in cervical conization specimens for squamous lesions.
Sopracordevole F; Clemente N; Alessandrini L; Di Giuseppe J; Cigolot F; Buttignol M; Ciavattini A; Canzonieri V
Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Mar; 213(3):210-216. PubMed ID: 28214204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery.
Sadler L; Saftlas A; Wang W; Exeter M; Whittaker J; McCowan L
JAMA; 2004 May; 291(17):2100-6. PubMed ID: 15126438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical analysis of the effect of cervical conization on fertility and pregnancy outcome].
He HJ; Pan LY; Huang HF; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 42(8):515-7. PubMed ID: 17983487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the prediction of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Crane JM; Delaney T; Hutchens D
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 107(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16394037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Obstetrical prognosis of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) after "coin-shaped" conization.
Kim M; Ishioka S; Endo T; Baba T; Saito T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 293(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 26305031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth: A Dutch population-based cohort study with 45,259 pregnancy outcomes.
Loopik DL; van Drongelen J; Bekkers RLM; Voorham QJM; Melchers WJG; Massuger LFAG; van Kemenade FJ; Siebers AG
PLoS Med; 2021 Jun; 18(6):e1003665. PubMed ID: 34086680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Obstetric outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: six years of experience.
Lima AF; Francisco C; Júlio C; Paula T; Vitorino A; Borrego J
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Oct; 15(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 21959571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Excisional treatments of the cervix and effect on subsequent fertility: a retrospective cohort study.
Martyn FM; McAuliffe FM; Beggan C; Downey P; Flannelly G; Wingfield MB
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Feb; 185():114-20. PubMed ID: 25557866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pregnancy outcomes after cold knife conization related to excised cone dimensions. A retrospective cohort study.
Sozen H; Namazov A; Cakir S; Akdemir Y; Vatansever D; Karateke A
J Reprod Med; 2014; 59(1-2):81-6. PubMed ID: 24597292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in pregnancy: clinicotherapeutic management.
Penna C; Fallani MG; Maggiorelli M; Zipoli E; Cardelli A; Marchionni M
Tumori; 1998; 84(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 9862518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
