These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24324523)

  • 1. A probabilistic approach for breast boundary extraction in mammograms.
    Habibi Aghdam H; Puig D; Solanas A
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():408595. PubMed ID: 24324523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic multiple thresholding breast boundary detection algorithm for mammograms.
    Wu YT; Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Hadjiiski LM; Daly CP; Douglas JA; Zhang Y; Sahiner B; Shi J; Wei J
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):391-401. PubMed ID: 20175501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radial-searching contour extraction method based on a modified active contour model for mammographic masses.
    Nakagawa T; Hara T; Fujita H; Horita K; Iwase T; Endo T
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2008 Jul; 1(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 20821141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of the breast boundary in mammograms using active contour models.
    Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Borges RA; Frère AF
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2004 Mar; 42(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 15125150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fully automated breast boundary and pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms.
    Rampun A; Morrow PJ; Scotney BW; Winder J
    Artif Intell Med; 2017 Jun; 79():28-41. PubMed ID: 28606722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A hierarchical pipeline for breast boundary segmentation and calcification detection in mammograms.
    Shi P; Zhong J; Rampun A; Wang H
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():178-188. PubMed ID: 29597143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
    Kus P; Karagoz I
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of intelligent systems based on Bayesian regularization network and neuro-fuzzy models for mass detection in mammograms: A comparative analysis.
    Mahersia H; Boulehmi H; Hamrouni K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():46-62. PubMed ID: 26831269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new idea for visualization of lesions distribution in mammogram based on CPD registration method.
    Pan X; Qi B; Yu H; Wei H; Kang Y
    Technol Health Care; 2017 Jul; 25(S1):459-467. PubMed ID: 28582934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM
    Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):1056-69. PubMed ID: 11439475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mass auto-detection in mammogram based on wavelet transform modulus maximum.
    Ke L; He W; Kang Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():5760-3. PubMed ID: 19963653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms using a modified holistically-nested edge detection network.
    Rampun A; López-Linares K; Morrow PJ; Scotney BW; Wang H; Ocaña IG; Maclair G; Zwiggelaar R; González Ballester MA; Macía I
    Med Image Anal; 2019 Oct; 57():1-17. PubMed ID: 31254729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
    Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A robust method for segmenting pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammograms.
    Yin K; Yan S; Song C; Zheng B
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):237-248. PubMed ID: 30288698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Review of recent advances in segmentation of the breast boundary and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.
    Mustra M; Grgic M; Rangayyan RM
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Jul; 54(7):1003-24. PubMed ID: 26546074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accurate segmentation of the breast region from digitized mammograms.
    Ojala T; Näppi J; Nevalainen O
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2001; 25(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 11120407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
    Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast microcalcifications detection based on fusing features with DTCWT.
    Wang Z; Xin J; Zhang Q; Gao S; Ma C; Ren J; Zhang H; Qian W; Zhu W; Zhang X; Liu J
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(2):197-218. PubMed ID: 31985483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices.
    Chan HP; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhang Y; Moore RH; Kopans DB; Hadjiiski L; Way T
    Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3576-86. PubMed ID: 20831065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.