These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24324523)

  • 21. Breast peripheral area correction in digital mammograms.
    Tortajada M; Oliver A; Martí R; Ganau S; Tortajada L; Sentís M; Freixenet J; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jul; 50():32-40. PubMed ID: 24845018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An ellipse-fitting based method for efficient registration of breast masses on two mammographic views.
    Pu J; Zheng B; Leader JK; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 18383669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automatic Pectoral Muscle Region Segmentation in Mammograms Using Genetic Algorithm and Morphological Selection.
    Shen R; Yan K; Xiao F; Chang J; Jiang C; Zhou K
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Oct; 31(5):680-691. PubMed ID: 29582242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pectoral muscle detection in mammograms based on the shortest path with endpoints learnt by SVMs.
    Domingues I; Cardoso JS; Amaral I; Moreira I; Passarinho P; Santa Comba J; Correia R; Cardoso MJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3158-61. PubMed ID: 21096595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diffuse boundary extraction of breast masses on ultrasound by leak plugging.
    Cary TW; Conant EF; Arger PH; Sehgal CM
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3318-28. PubMed ID: 16370419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measures of divergence of oriented patterns for the detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.
    Rangayyan RM; Banik S; Chakraborty J; Mukhopadhyay S; Desautels JE
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2013 Jul; 8(4):527-45. PubMed ID: 23054747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of the Cluster Prominence Feature for Detecting Calcifications in Mammograms.
    Cruz-Bernal A; Flores-Barranco MM; Almanza-Ojeda DL; Ledesma S; Ibarra-Manzano MA
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():2849567. PubMed ID: 30687489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
    Singh S; Bovis K
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A statistical approach for breast density segmentation.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Pérez E; Pont J; Denton ER; Freixenet J; Martí J
    J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):527-37. PubMed ID: 19506953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mass Segmentation in Automated 3-D Breast Ultrasound Using Adaptive Region Growing and Supervised Edge-Based Deformable Model.
    Kozegar E; Soryani M; Behnam H; Salamati M; Tan T
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Apr; 37(4):918-928. PubMed ID: 29610071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mammographic mass segmentation using fuzzy contours.
    Hmida M; Hamrouni K; Solaiman B; Boussetta S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 164():131-142. PubMed ID: 30195421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Detection and Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle on MLO-View Mammogram Using Enhancement Filter.
    Vikhe PS; Thool VR
    J Med Syst; 2017 Oct; 41(12):190. PubMed ID: 29071592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Breast cancer risk analysis based on a novel segmentation framework for digital mammograms.
    Chen X; Moschidis E; Taylor C; Astley S
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 1):536-43. PubMed ID: 25333160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours.
    Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interactive breast mass segmentation using a convex active contour model with optimal threshold values.
    Acho SN; Rae WI
    Phys Med; 2016 Oct; 32(10):1352-1359. PubMed ID: 27265043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A population-based tissue probability map-driven level set method for fully automated mammographic density estimations.
    Kim Y; Hong BW; Kim SJ; Kim JH
    Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071905. PubMed ID: 24989383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A similarity measure method combining location feature for mammogram retrieval.
    Wang Z; Xin J; Huang Y; Li C; Xu L; Li Y; Zhang H; Gu H; Qian W
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(4):553-571. PubMed ID: 29865106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Local Binary Patterns Descriptor Based on Sparse Curvelet Coefficients for False-Positive Reduction in Mammograms.
    Pawar MM; Talbar SN; Dudhane A
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():5940436. PubMed ID: 30356422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Generation and application of a probabilistic breast cancer atlas.
    Russakoff DB; Hasegawa A
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):454-61. PubMed ID: 17354804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.