278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24324712)
1. Agreement of mammographic measures of volumetric breast density to MRI.
Wang J; Azziz A; Fan B; Malkov S; Klifa C; Newitt D; Yitta S; Hylton N; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd JA
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81653. PubMed ID: 24324712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated Volumetric Mammographic Breast Density Measurements May Underestimate Percent Breast Density for High-density Breasts.
Rahbar K; Gubern-Merida A; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
Acad Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1561-1569. PubMed ID: 28754209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Kim JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods.
Eng A; Gallant Z; Shepherd J; McCormack V; Li J; Dowsett M; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; dos-Santos-Silva I
Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Sep; 16(5):439. PubMed ID: 25239205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density: a tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment.
Brand JS; Czene K; Shepherd JA; Leifland K; Heddson B; Sundbom A; Eriksson M; Li J; Humphreys K; Hall P
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Sep; 23(9):1764-72. PubMed ID: 25012995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic density estimation with automated volumetric breast density measurement.
Ko SY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 24843235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer.
Duffy SW; Morrish OWE; Allgood PC; Black R; Gillan MGC; Willsher P; Cooke J; Duncan KA; Michell MJ; Dobson HM; Maroni R; Lim YY; Purushothaman HN; Suaris T; Astley SM; Young KC; Tucker L; Gilbert FJ
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Jan; 88():48-56. PubMed ID: 29190506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative Volumetric K-Means Cluster Segmentation of Fibroglandular Tissue and Skin in Breast MRI.
Niukkanen A; Arponen O; Nykänen A; Masarwah A; Sutela A; Liimatainen T; Vanninen R; Sudah M
J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):425-434. PubMed ID: 29047034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories.
Singh T; Sharma M; Singla V; Khandelwal N
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation.
Gard CC; Aiello Bowles EJ; Miglioretti DL; Taplin SH; Rutter CM
Breast J; 2015; 21(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 26133090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Double-Blind Randomized 12-Month Soy Intervention Had No Effects on Breast MRI Fibroglandular Tissue Density or Mammographic Density.
Wu AH; Spicer D; Garcia A; Tseng CC; Hovanessian-Larsen L; Sheth P; Martin SE; Hawes D; Russell C; MacDonald H; Tripathy D; Su MY; Ursin G; Pike MC
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2015 Oct; 8(10):942-51. PubMed ID: 26276750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic breast density: comparison of methods for quantitative evaluation.
Morrish OW; Tucker L; Black R; Willsher P; Duffy SW; Gilbert FJ
Radiology; 2015 May; 275(2):356-65. PubMed ID: 25559234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of BI-RADS-based subjective visual estimation of amount of fibroglandular breast tissue with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison to automated quantitative assessment.
Wengert GJ; Helbich TH; Woitek R; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Baltzer PA; Vogl WD; Weber M; Meyer-Baese A; Pinker K
Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):3917-3922. PubMed ID: 27108300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of mammographic density estimation by Volpara software with radiologists' visual assessment: analysis of clinical-radiologic factors affecting discrepancy between them.
Lee HN; Sohn YM; Han KH
Acta Radiol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25338836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
