These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24324712)

  • 21. Comparing Visually Assessed BI-RADS Breast Density and Automated Volumetric Breast Density Software: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Breast Cancer Screening Setting.
    van der Waal D; den Heeten GJ; Pijnappel RM; Schuur KH; Timmers JM; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136667. PubMed ID: 26335569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mammographic density: Comparison of visual assessment with fully automatic calculation on a multivendor dataset.
    Sacchetto D; Morra L; Agliozzo S; Bernardi D; Björklund T; Brancato B; Bravetti P; Carbonaro LA; Correale L; Fantò C; Favettini E; Martincich L; Milanesio L; Mombelloni S; Monetti F; Morrone D; Pellegrini M; Pesce B; Petrillo A; Saguatti G; Stevanin C; Trimboli RM; Tuttobene P; Valentini M; Marra V; Frigerio A; Bert A; Sardanelli F
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):175-83. PubMed ID: 25929945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mammographic density, MRI background parenchymal enhancement and breast cancer risk.
    Pike MC; Pearce CL
    Ann Oncol; 2013 Nov; 24 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):viii37-viii41. PubMed ID: 24131968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Associations between quantitative measures of mammographic density and terminal ductal lobular unit involution in Chinese breast cancer patients.
    Mburu W; Guo C; Tian Y; Koka H; Fu S; Lu N; Li E; Li J; Cora R; Chan A; Guida JL; Sung H; Gierach GL; Abubakar M; Yu K; Yang XR
    Breast Cancer Res; 2024 Jul; 26(1):116. PubMed ID: 39010116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment.
    Gweon HM; Youk JH; Kim JA; Son EJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 23971465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer.
    Shepherd JA; Kerlikowske K; Ma L; Duewer F; Fan B; Wang J; Malkov S; Vittinghoff E; Cummings SR
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2011 Jul; 20(7):1473-82. PubMed ID: 21610220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Determinants of volumetric breast density in Chilean premenopausal women.
    Pereira A; Garmendia ML; Uauy R; Neira P; Lopez-Arana S; Malkov S; Shepherd J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Apr; 162(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 28132392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography.
    Keller BM; Chen J; Daye D; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Aug; 17():117. PubMed ID: 26303303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms.
    Redondo A; Comas M; Macià F; Ferrer F; Murta-Nascimento C; Maristany MT; Molins E; Sala M; Castells X
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22993385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Volumetric mammographic density: heritability and association with breast cancer susceptibility loci.
    Brand JS; Humphreys K; Thompson DJ; Li J; Eriksson M; Hall P; Czene K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Dec; 106(12):. PubMed ID: 25376863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.
    Keller BM; Nathan DL; Wang Y; Zheng Y; Gee JC; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4903-17. PubMed ID: 22894417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of mammographic density assessed as volumes and areas among women undergoing diagnostic image-guided breast biopsy.
    Gierach GL; Geller BM; Shepherd JA; Patel DA; Vacek PM; Weaver DL; Chicoine RE; Pfeiffer RM; Fan B; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Wang J; Johnson JM; Herschorn SD; Brinton LA; Sherman ME
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Nov; 23(11):2338-48. PubMed ID: 25139935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the Mayo Mammography Health Study cohort.
    Olson JE; Sellers TA; Scott CG; Schueler BA; Brandt KR; Serie DJ; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Morton MJ; Heine JJ; Couch FJ; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R147. PubMed ID: 23152984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Background risk of breast cancer and the association between physical activity and mammographic density.
    Trinh T; Eriksson M; Darabi H; Bonn SE; Brand JS; Cuzick J; Czene K; Sjölander A; Bälter K; Hall P
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Apr; 17(1):50. PubMed ID: 25888057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of subjective and fully automated methods for measuring mammographic density.
    Moshina N; Roman M; Sebuødegård S; Waade GG; Ursin G; Hofvind S
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Feb; 59(2):154-160. PubMed ID: 28565960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Single x-ray absorptiometry method for the quantitative mammographic measure of fibroglandular tissue volume.
    Malkov S; Wang J; Kerlikowske K; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5525-36. PubMed ID: 20095265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Are Qualitative Assessments of Background Parenchymal Enhancement, Amount of Fibroglandular Tissue on MR Images, and Mammographic Density Associated with Breast Cancer Risk?
    Dontchos BN; Rahbar H; Partridge SC; Korde LA; Lam DL; Scheel JR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
    Radiology; 2015 Aug; 276(2):371-80. PubMed ID: 25965809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Geographic variation in volumetric breast density between screening regions in the Netherlands.
    van der Waal D; Emaus MJ; Bakker MF; den Heeten GJ; Karssemeijer N; Pijnappel RM; Veldhuis WB; Verbeek AL; van Gils CH; Broeders MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Nov; 25(11):3328-37. PubMed ID: 26134996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
    Ekpo EU; Ujong UP; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1119-23. PubMed ID: 26999655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fully automated measurements of volumetric breast density adapted for BIRADS 5th edition: a comparison with visual assessment.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Kim JA
    Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 32910685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.