These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24325170)

  • 1. Single-center comparison of gel microcolumn and solid-phase methods for antibody screening.
    Schmidt A; Bendix BJ; Eapen EK; Bryant SC; Stubbs JR
    Immunohematology; 2013; 29(3):101-4. PubMed ID: 24325170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparative study of antibody identification in the gel centrifugation test (ID Microtyping System), solid phase antiglobulin test (Solidscreen Capture R, Ready ID) and tube test].
    Hitzler W; Johanson C; Schömig-Brekner J; Mathias D
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1992; 30():370-4. PubMed ID: 1284737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of an automated solid-phase red cell adherence system compared with that of a manual gel microcolumn assay for the identification of antibodies eluted from red blood cells.
    Finck RH; Davis RJ; Teng S; Goldfinger D; Ziman AF; Lu Q; Yuan S
    Immunohematology; 2011; 27(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 22356479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [3 new antibody detection tests. A comparative study].
    Mempel W; Alraun K; Leeping M; Kirschner M; Reiser H; Heim MU
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():362-6. PubMed ID: 1703872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antibody identification using both automated solid-phase red cell adherence assay and a tube polyethylene glycol antiglobulin method.
    Yamada C; Serrano-Rahman L; Vasovic LV; Mohandas K; Uehlinger J
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1693-8. PubMed ID: 18482178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Analysis of irregular antibodies in the department of transfusion medicine 1984-1988].
    Wittkopf D; Grundmann A; Sibrowski W; von Eisenhart-Rothe V; Kühnl P
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():415-9. PubMed ID: 1703889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anti-Jk
    Kay B; Poisson JL; Tuma CW; Shulman IA
    Transfusion; 2016 Dec; 56(12):2973-2979. PubMed ID: 27596036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Decision aides in immunohematology: detection of anti-erythrocyte antibodies].
    Roubinet F; Mannessier L; Chiaroni J; Lauroua P
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2000 Oct; 7(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 11109636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of antibodies in acid eluates with the gel microcolumn assay.
    Greco VA; Byrne KM; Procter JL; Stroncek DF
    Transfusion; 2002 Jun; 42(6):698-701. PubMed ID: 12147021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Solid phase technique versus gel centrifugation for detection of erythrocyte antibodies--a prospective study comparison the 2 antibody detection tests].
    Zeiler T; Thiele S; Kretschmer V
    Beitr Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1996; 33():17-21. PubMed ID: 8974691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anti-A antibody transfused with non-group-specific platelets. Serological abnormalities.
    Thomas L; Tuscany FL; Wilner GD
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1981 Jan; 105(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 6893913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of solid-phase antibody screening tests with pooled red cells in blood donors.
    Schrem A; Flegel WA
    Vox Sang; 1996; 71(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 8837355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of a gel microcolumn assay with the conventional tube test for red blood cell alloantibody titration.
    Finck R; Lui-Deguzman C; Teng SM; Davis R; Yuan S
    Transfusion; 2013 Apr; 53(4):811-5. PubMed ID: 22804101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to recognize and resolve reagent-dependent reactivity: a review.
    Patch GC; Hutchinson CF; Lang NA; Khalife G
    Immunohematology; 2016 Sep; 32(3):96-99. PubMed ID: 27834481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the performance of microtube column systems and solid-phase systems and the tube low-ionic-strength solution additive indirect antiglobulin test in the detection of red cell alloantibodies.
    Weisbach V; Kohnhäuser T; Zimmermann R; Ringwald J; Strasser E; Zingsem J; Eckstein R
    Transfus Med; 2006 Aug; 16(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 16879156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The gel centrifugation test in serologic compatibility testing].
    Hitzler W; Bauernfeind U; Schömig-Brekner J; Mathias D
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():358-61. PubMed ID: 1703871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patients with red cell autoantibodies: selection of blood for transfusion.
    Sokol RJ; Hewitt S; Booker DJ; Morris BM
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1988; 10(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 3180694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the gel-based DiaMed-ID microtyping system for crossmatching enhances sensitivity.
    Kaur R; Kakkar N; Dhanoa J
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2003 Oct; 46(4):617-20. PubMed ID: 15025357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Polyethylene glycol antiglobulin tube versus gel microcolumn: influence on the incidence of delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions and delayed serologic transfusion reactions.
    Winters JL; Richa EM; Bryant SC; Tauscher CD; Bendix BJ; Stubbs JR
    Transfusion; 2010 Jul; 50(7):1444-52. PubMed ID: 20230534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification and evaluation of false-negative antibody screens.
    Powers A; Chandrashekar S; Mohammed M; Uhl L
    Transfusion; 2010 Mar; 50(3):617-21. PubMed ID: 19951323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.