These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2432518)
1. What is the most appropriate stimulation mode in patients with sinus node dysfunction? Markewitz A; Schad N; Hemmer W; Bernheim C; Ciavolella M; Weinhold C Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1986 Nov; 9(6):1115-20. PubMed ID: 2432518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with different mode of pacing. Long-term follow-up. Folino AF; Buja G; Corso L Dal ; Nava A Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 2):260-3. PubMed ID: 9474684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term outcome of single-chamber atrial pacing compared with dual-chamber pacing in patients with sinus-node dysfunction and intact atrioventricular node conduction. Kim WH; Joung B; Shim J; Park JS; Hwang ES; Pak HN; Kim S; Lee M Yonsei Med J; 2010 Nov; 51(6):832-7. PubMed ID: 20879047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. Hesselson AB; Parsonnet V; Bernstein AD; Bonavita GJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 19(7):1542-9. PubMed ID: 1593051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pacing mode survival in patients with single chamber atrial pacemaker for sinus node dysfunction. Velayuthan R; Sukumar SK; Bootla D; Balaguru S; Anantharaj A; Satheesh S; Selvaraj RJ Indian Heart J; 2024; 76(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 38070672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Pacemaker therapy for the sick sinus node syndrome. Does the atrially involved pacemaker system lower the frequency of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic complications as well as mortality?]. Hofgärtner F; Maier B; Eisele R; Hauber J; Sigel H Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1994 Dec; 119(49):1683-9. PubMed ID: 7988373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Results of long-term permanent atrial stimulation in sick sinus disease]. Goicolea de Oro A; Bescós LL; Pastor Fuentes A; Esteban Paúl E; Kallmeyer Martín C; Chicote Ramos R Rev Esp Cardiol; 1997 Jul; 50(7):474-9. PubMed ID: 9304174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DDI pacing: indications, expectations, and follow-up. Irwin M; Harris L; Cameron D; Louis C; Radvanszky E; Goldman B Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Mar; 17(3 Pt 1):274-9. PubMed ID: 7513851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence. Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. AAI pacing mode: when is it indicated and how should it be achieved? Katritsis D; Camm AJ Clin Cardiol; 1993 Apr; 16(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 8458114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of the optimal atrioventricular interval in sick sinus syndrome during DDD pacing. Kato M; Dote K; Sasaki S; Goto K; Takemoto H; Habara S; Hasegawa D; Matsuda O Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Sep; 28(9):892-7. PubMed ID: 16176525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhythmic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Stangl K; Seitz K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):2080-5. PubMed ID: 1704597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays. Ovsyshcher I; Zimlichman R; Katz A; Bondy C; Furman S J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 8436759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neuroendocrine and haemodynamic changes in single-lead atrial pacing and dual-chamber pacing modes. Zhang YY; Wu DY; Fu NK; Lu FM; Xu J J Int Med Res; 2013 Aug; 41(4):1057-66. PubMed ID: 23816931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Avoidance of ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node disease or intermittent AV block]. Wiegand UK Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2008 Mar; 19(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 18330670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regional myocardial blood flow in patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to long-term single chamber atrial or dual chamber pacing--effect of pacing mode and rate. Nielsen JC; Bøttcher M; Nielsen TT; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 May; 35(6):1453-61. PubMed ID: 10807447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of automatic mode change between DDD and AAI to facilitate native atrioventricular conduction in patients with sick sinus syndrome or transient atrioventricular block. Mayumi H; Kohno H; Yasui H; Kawachi Y; Tokunaga K Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1740-7. PubMed ID: 8945033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [30 years cardiac pacemaker therapy: a status evaluation]. Stangl K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):383-95. PubMed ID: 2198730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparative effects of atrial and ventricular stimulation on morbidity and mortality in patients with sinus node disease]. Zanini R; Facchinetti AI; Gallo G; Cazzamalli L; Metra M; Benedini G Cardiologia; 1990 Jun; 35(6):499-502. PubMed ID: 2078840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode. Brandt J; Anderson H; Fåhraeus T; Schüller H J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]