These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2432526)

  • 1. Ten-year experience with implanted polyurethane lead insulation.
    Stokes KB; Church T
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1986 Nov; 9(6):1160-5. PubMed ID: 2432526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term performance of polyurethane pacing leads: mechanisms of design-related failures.
    Phillips R; Frey M; Martin RO
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1986 Nov; 9(6):1166-72. PubMed ID: 2432527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is polyurethane lead insulation still controversial?
    Mugica J; Daubert JC; Lazarus B; Henry L; Duconge R; Lespinasse P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1967-70. PubMed ID: 1279581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implant experience with unipolar polyurethane pacing leads.
    Byrd CL; McArthur W; Stokes K; Sivina M; Yahr WZ; Greenberg J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Sep; 6(5 Pt 1):869-82. PubMed ID: 6195605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Five-year performance of the Medtronic 6971 polyurethane endocardial electrode.
    Pirzada FA; Seltzer JP; Blair-Saletin D; Killian M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1986 Nov; 9(6):1173-80. PubMed ID: 2432528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bipolar tined polyurethane ventricular lead: a four-year experience.
    Hayes DL; Holmes DR; Merideth J; Osborn MJ; Vlietstra RE; Neubauer SA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1985 Mar; 8(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 2580280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multicenter experience with a bipolar tined polyurethane ventricular lead.
    Hayes DL; Graham KJ; Irwin M; Vidaillet H; Disler G; Sweesy M; Osborn MJ; Suman VJ; Neubauer SA; Seebandt M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Jul; 15(7):1033-9. PubMed ID: 1378595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. False inhibition of an atrial demand pacemaker caused by an insulation defect in a polyurethane lead.
    van Gelder LM; El Gamal MI
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Sep; 6(5 Pt 1):834-9. PubMed ID: 6195601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The significance of surface changes on explanted polyurethane pacemaker leads.
    Timmis GC; Westveer DC; Martin R; Gordon S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Sep; 6(5 Pt 1):845-57. PubMed ID: 6195603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polyurethane leads: facts and controversy.
    Scheuer-Leeser M; Irnich W; Kreuzer J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Mar; 6(2 Pt 2):454-63. PubMed ID: 6189092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Insulation lead failure: is it a matter of insulation coating, venous approach, or both?
    Antonelli D; Rosenfeld T; Freedberg NA; Palma E; Gross JN; Furman S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Feb; 21(2):418-21. PubMed ID: 9507543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an in-line bipolar polyurethane ventricular pacing lead.
    Sweesy MW; Forney CC; Hayes DL; Batey RL; Forney RC
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1982-5. PubMed ID: 1279584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Insulation failure with bipolar polyurethane pacing leads.
    Raymond RD; Nanian KB
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 May; 7(3 Pt 1):378-80. PubMed ID: 6204290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term comparison of the electrical characteristics of polyurethane and polyethylene insulated ventricular leads.
    Bluhm G; Larsen FF; Nordlander R; Pehrsson SK
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 May; 13(5):583-7. PubMed ID: 1693194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examination of explanted polyurethane pacemaker leads using the scanning electron microscope.
    Beyersdorf F; Kreuzer J; Schmidts L; Satter P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1985 Jul; 8(4):562-8. PubMed ID: 2410883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-inhibition of an AV sequential demand (DVI) pulse generator due to polyurethane lead insulation disruption.
    Sanford CF
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Sep; 6(5 Pt 1):840-4. PubMed ID: 6195602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Degradation of explanted polyurethane cardiac pacing leads and of polyurethane.
    Chawla AS; Blais P; Hinberg I; Johnson D
    Biomater Artif Cells Artif Organs; 1988; 16(4):785-800. PubMed ID: 3219417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Difficulties with coaxial bipolar polyurethane insulated leads.
    Irnich W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jan; 16(1 Pt 1):126. PubMed ID: 7681167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term follow-up of pacemaker lead systems: establishment of standards of quality.
    Furman S; Benedek ZM; Andrews CA; Gross JN; Ritacco R
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Feb; 18(2):271-85. PubMed ID: 7731875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of lead complications with polyurethane tined, silicone rubber tined, and wedge tip leads: clinical experience with 822 ventricular endocardial lads.
    Kertes P; Mond H; Sloman G; Vohra J; Hunt D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Sep; 6(5 Pt 1):957-62. PubMed ID: 6195617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.