These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24325621)

  • 21. How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign.
    Kravitz ND; Kusnoto B; BeGole E; Obrez A; Agran B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 19121497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Proposed Methodology to Assess the Accuracy of 3D Scanners and Casts and Monitor Tooth Wear Progression in Patients.
    Ahmed KE; Whitters J; Ju X; Pierce SG; MacLeod CN; Murray CA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):514-21. PubMed ID: 27611759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
    Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mandibular changes secondary to serial extractions compared with late premolar extractions and controls.
    Feldman E; Kennedy DB; Aleksejuniene J; Hannam AG; Yen EH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 26432319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The topography of displaced canines: a 3D-CT study.
    Hofmann E; Rodich M; Hirschfelder U
    J Orofac Orthop; 2011 Aug; 72(4):247-52, 254-60. PubMed ID: 21826539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines.
    Botticelli S; Verna C; Cattaneo PM; Heidmann J; Melsen B
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 21131389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting tooth-size discrepancy: A new formula utilizing revised landmarks and 3-dimensional laser scanning technology.
    Bailey E; Nelson G; Miller AJ; Andrews L; Johnson E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):574-85. PubMed ID: 23561420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography in the assessment of external apical root resorption induced by orthodontic therapy: a retrospective study.
    Sunku R; Roopesh R; Kancherla P; Perumalla KK; Yudhistar PV; Reddy VS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):422-8. PubMed ID: 22269231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Changes over time in canine retraction: an implant study.
    Martins RP; Buschang PH; Gandini LG; Rossouw PE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 19577153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of tip and torque on virtual study models: a validation study.
    Huanca Ghislanzoni LT; Lineberger M; Cevidanes LH; Mapelli A; Sforza C; McNamara JA
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Jul; 14():19. PubMed ID: 24325839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tooth inclination in elderly with many remaining teeth observed by 3-D imaging.
    Fukagawa H; Motegi E; Fuma A; Nomura M; Kano M; Sueishi K; Okano S
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2010; 51(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 20689237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 3D FEM comparison of lingual and labial orthodontics in en masse retraction.
    Lombardo L; Scuzzo G; Arreghini A; Gorgun O; Ortan YO; Siciliani G
    Prog Orthod; 2014 May; 15(1):38. PubMed ID: 24950350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Treatment of Bi-maxillary Protrusion with Impacted Maxillary and Mandibular Canines: Case Report.
    Shdrma VK; Yadav K; Nagar A; Tandon P; Chaturvedi TP
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 27319045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An accurate and efficient method for occlusal tooth wear assessment using 3D digital dental models.
    Gkantidis N; Dritsas K; Ren Y; Halazonetis D; Katsaros C
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):10103. PubMed ID: 32572141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Peridental bone changes after orthodontic tooth movement with fixed appliances: A cone-beam computed tomographic study.
    Jäger F; Mah JK; Bumann A
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):672-680. PubMed ID: 28553985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models.
    Burns A; Dowling AH; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 25064042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of Periodontal Changes Adjacent to Extraction Sites during Upper Canine Retraction.
    Al-Jundi A; Sabbagh BA; Baskaradoss JK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb; 18(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 28174364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Finite element analysis of the effect of power arm locations on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew anchorage in customized lingual orthodontic treatment.
    Feng Y; Kong WD; Cen WJ; Zhou XZ; Zhang W; Li QT; Guo HY; Yu JW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):210-219. PubMed ID: 31375231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Point-based superimposition of a digital dental model on to a three-dimensional computed tomographic skull: an accuracy study in vitro.
    Lin X; Chen T; Liu J; Jiang T; Yu D; Shen SG
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 53(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25300890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.