BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24325842)

  • 1. Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
    Arieta-Miranda JM; Silva-Valencia M; Flores-Mir C; Paredes-Sampen NA; Arriola-Guillen LE
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Oct; 14():36. PubMed ID: 24325842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in skeletal class Ⅱ female adolescents with different vertical patterns].
    Zhou J; Liu Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):109-119. PubMed ID: 33550344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.
    Becht MP; Mah J; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 24456631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of mandibular volume using cone-beam computed tomography and correlation with cephalometric values.
    Katayama K; Yamaguchi T; Sugiura M; Haga S; Maki K
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 23985034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns.
    Rodriguez-Cardenas YA; Arriola-Guillen LE; Flores-Mir C
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):46-53. PubMed ID: 25628079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The prevalence of TMJ osteoarthritis in asymptomatic patients with dentofacial deformities: a cone-beam CT study.
    Krisjane Z; Urtane I; Krumina G; Neimane L; Ragovska I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 41(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 22464854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of intended manual condylar positioning on skeletal and dental changes in Skeletal Class III deformities: CBCT-generated half-cephalograms.
    Hwang DS; Kim YI; Lee KM
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 23434240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of condyle position in patients with Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography panoramic reconstructions.
    Akbulut A; Kılınç DD
    Oral Radiol; 2019 Jan; 35(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 30484184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between occlusal force and mandibular condyle morphology. Evaluated by limited cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kurusu A; Horiuchi M; Soma K
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1063-9. PubMed ID: 19852595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Condylar response to functional therapy with Twin-Block as shown by cone-beam computed tomography.
    Yildirim E; Karacay S; Erkan M
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1018-25. PubMed ID: 24713070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between upper airways and craniofacial morphology studied in 3D. A CBCT study.
    Di Carlo G; Polimeni A; Melsen B; Cattaneo PM
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 25237711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of Volume and Height of the Coronoid Process in Patients With Different Facial Types and Skeletal Classes: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Gomes AF; Nejaim Y; Brasil DM; Groppo FC; Ferreira Caria PH; Haiter Neto F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1395.e1-5. PubMed ID: 25976692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study of the pharyngeal airway space, measured with cone beam computed tomography, between patients with different craniofacial morphologies.
    Dalmau E; Zamora N; Tarazona B; Gandia JL; Paredes V
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1438-46. PubMed ID: 26189145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Newly defined landmarks for a three-dimensionally based cephalometric analysis: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography scan review.
    Lee M; Kanavakis G; Miner RM
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24866835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway volume in adults with anterior position of the mandible.
    Hong JS; Oh KM; Kim BR; Kim YJ; Park YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e161-9. PubMed ID: 21967954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cone-beam CT analysis of vertical control of mandible and changes of temporomandibular joint in adult patients with skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion with high angle].
    Wei Y; Zhang GR; Liu YN; Chen WYF; Zhang XZ; Cao BC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Nov; 57(11):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 36379894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescents with unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    Halicioglu K; Celikoglu M; Yavuz I; Sekerci AE; Buyuk SK
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24968641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of skeletal structure of temporomandibular joint through cone-beam CT between Angle ClassⅠ, Ⅱ
    Song JY; Qian LW; Cheng MJ; Qian YF
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2019 Aprial; 28(2):141-147. PubMed ID: 31384898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved Visualization and Assessment of Condylar Position in the Glenoid Fossa for Different Occlusions: A CBCT Study.
    Kaur A; Natt AS; Mehra SK; Maheshwari K; Singh G; Kaur A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(8):679-86. PubMed ID: 27659088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.