These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24326013)

  • 1. Comparison of survival time between two types of orthodontic fixed retainer: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Salehi P; Zarif Najafi H; Roeinpeikar SM
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():25. PubMed ID: 24326013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention.
    Rose E; Frucht S; Jonas IE
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 12238688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Clinical comparison of bond failure rate between two types of mandibular canine-canine bonded orthodontic retainers- a randomized clinical trial".
    Nagani NI; Ahmed I; Tanveer F; Khursheed HM; Farooqui WA
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):180. PubMed ID: 32600325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites.
    Foek DL; Ozcan M; Krebs E; Sandham A
    J Adhes Dent; 2009 Oct; 11(5):381-90. PubMed ID: 19841765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical comparison between Multi-Stranded Wires and Single strand Ribbon wires used for lingual fixed retainers.
    Arash V; Teimoorian M; Farajzadeh Jalali Y; Sheikhzadeh S
    Prog Orthod; 2020 Jun; 21(1):22. PubMed ID: 32596755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial comparing placement time and failure over a 6-month period.
    Bovali E; Kiliaridis S; Cornelis MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 25432250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shear bond strength of different fixed orthodontic retainers.
    Al-Nimri K; Al-Nimri J
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 26999891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term effectiveness of canine-to-canine bonded flexible spiral wire lingual retainers.
    Renkema AM; Renkema A; Bronkhorst E; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):614-21. PubMed ID: 21536204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival analysis of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers: a retrospective cohort.
    Rezaei N; Bagheri Z; Golshah A
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 May; 22(1):159. PubMed ID: 35524248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A 3-year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers.
    Artun J; Spadafora AT; Shapiro PA
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Oct; 19(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 9386336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and radiographic comparison of the effects of two types of fixed retainers on periodontium - a randomized clinical trial.
    Torkan S; Oshagh M; Khojastepour L; Shahidi S; Heidari S
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Aug; 15(1):47. PubMed ID: 25162332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond failure rates for V-loop vs straight wire lingual retainers.
    Lee KD; Mills CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):502-6. PubMed ID: 19361737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survival rates of mandibular fixed retainers: comparison of a tube-type retainer and conventional multistrand retainers : A prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Lee KC; Lim SW; Cho JH; Oh H; Hwang HS
    J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Sep; 85(5):309-316. PubMed ID: 36847790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Bonding and retention].
    Mauchamp OP
    Orthod Fr; 2009 Jun; 80(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 19552884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tensile test and interface retention forces between wires and composites in lingual fixed retainers.
    Paolone MG; Kaitsas R; Obach P; Kaitsas V; Benedicenti S; Sorrenti E; Barberis F
    Int Orthod; 2015 Jun; 13(2):210-220. PubMed ID: 26003122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A bonding technique for fixed maxillary retainers.
    Patcas R; Pedroli G
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 23269696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Periodontal effects and survival rates of different mandibular retainers: comparison of bonding technique and wire thickness.
    Gökçe B; Kaya B
    Eur J Orthod; 2019 Nov; 41(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 31365926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: Comparison of retainer failures and posttreatment stability. A 2-year follow-up of a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Egli F; Bovali E; Kiliaridis S; Cornelis MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 28024770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival of maxillary and mandibular bonded retainers 10 to 15 years after orthodontic treatment: a retrospective observational study.
    Kocher KE; Gebistorf MC; Pandis N; Fudalej PS; Katsaros C
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Jul; 20(1):28. PubMed ID: 31328248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced-plastic bonded orthodontic retainers.
    Ardeshna AP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):761-7. PubMed ID: 21640882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.