BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24326093)

  • 1. Relationship between vertical facial patterns and dental arch form in class II malocclusion.
    Grippaudo C; Oliva B; Greco AL; Sferra S; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Nov; 14():43. PubMed ID: 24326093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skeletal and dental characteristics in subjects with ankyloglossia.
    Srinivasan B; Chitharanjan AB
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Nov; 14():44. PubMed ID: 24326143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients.
    Kim SJ; Kim KH; Yu HS; Baik HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 24582023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
    Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
    Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
    Takriti M; Dashash M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application.
    Anwar N; Fida M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
    Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relapse and stability after mandibular setback surgery one year postoperatively: a retrospective study.
    Halvorsen ET; Beddari IY; Schilbred Eriksen E; Boe OE; Wisth PJ; Loes S; Moen K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1181.e1-11. PubMed ID: 24831939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early developmental traits in class II malocclusion.
    Varrela J
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1998 Dec; 56(6):375-7. PubMed ID: 10066120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions.
    Singh DP; Garg AK; Singh SP; Krishna Nayak US; Gupta M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 25511063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Curve of Spee and its relationship to vertical eruption of teeth among different malocclusion groups.
    Veli I; Ozturk MA; Uysal T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 25726397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of levelling of the curve of Spee on the proclination of mandibular incisors and expansion of dental arches: a prospective clinical trial.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Sifakakis I; Makou M; Eliades T
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20575202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III.
    Slaj M; Spalj S; Pavlin D; Illes D; Slaj M
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):919-24. PubMed ID: 20578864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shape variation and covariation of upper and lower dental arches of an orthodontic population.
    Papagiannis A; Halazonetis DJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 25840587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults.
    Forster CM; Sunga E; Chung CH
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 18263889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The mandibular response in Class II malocclusions correction.
    Cordua T; Deli R; Giuliante L; Ursini R
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 22031992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment.
    Cozza P; De Toffol L; Iacopini L
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dental and facial skeletal characteristics and growth of males and females with class II, division 1 malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14 (revisited)-part I: characteristics of size, form, and position.
    Rothstein T; Yoon-Tarlie C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):320-32. PubMed ID: 10715092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.