These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24326093)

  • 41. Influence of tonsillar grade on the dental arch measurements.
    Diouf JS; Ngom PI; Sonko O; Diop-Bâ K; Badiane A; Diagne F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 25636555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mandibular asymmetry in Class II subdivision malocclusion.
    Kurt G; Uysal T; Sisman Y; Ramoglu SI
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 18193958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of the Herbst appliance in growing orthodontic patients with different underlying vertical patterns.
    Deen E; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 May; 31(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 26219148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effect of zigzag elastics in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects with hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns. A pilot study.
    Aras A; Cinsar A; Bulut H
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 11544789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Alteration of maxillary and mandibular growth of adult patients with unoperated isolated cleft palate.
    Yang Y; Wu Y; Gu Y; Yang Q; Shi B; Zheng Q; Wang Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1078-82. PubMed ID: 23851744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparision of dental arch widths in different types of malocclusions.
    Basaran G; Hamamci N; Hamamci O
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e20-8. PubMed ID: 19641761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparisons of soft tissue chin thickness in adult patients with various mandibular divergence patterns.
    Macari AT; Hanna AE
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):708-14. PubMed ID: 24188123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The inadequacy of the Y-axis of growth (SNGn) for the vertical pattern assessment in patients with sagittal discrepancies.
    Paranhos LR; Brando TM; Kaieda AK; Ramos AL; Torres FC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Mar; 15(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 25095838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Changes of occlusal plane inclination after orthodontic treatment in different dentoskeletal frames.
    Li JL; Kau C; Wang M
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Jun; 15(1):41. PubMed ID: 25033937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible?
    Strahm C; De Sousa AP; Grobéty D; Mavropoulos A; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 19395370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Maintenance of a deep bite prior to surgical mandibular advancement.
    de Coul FO; Oosterkamp BC; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Pruim GJ; Sandham A
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19737779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of skeletal changes between female adolescents and adults with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion after orthodontic treatment.
    Ding Y; Zhao JH; Deng JR; Wang XJ
    Chin J Dent Res; 2012; 15(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 23509835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Discriminant factor analysis of dental arch dimensions with 3-dimensional virtual models.
    Slaj M; Spalj S; Jelusic D; Slaj M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):680-7. PubMed ID: 22051488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of arch forms between Israeli and North American white populations.
    Gafni Y; Tzur-Gadassi L; Nojima K; McLaughlin RP; Abed Y; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 21392688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [A comparative study of the transverse dimensions of the dental arches between Class I dental occlusion and Class II1 and Class II2 malocclusions].
    Halimi A; Azeroual MF; Abouqal R; Zaoui F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2011 Dec; 34(136):47-52. PubMed ID: 22457992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Bolton tooth size discrepancies in skeletal Class I individuals presenting with different dental angle classifications.
    Akyalçin S; Doğan S; Dinçer B; Erdinc AM; Oncağ G
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):637-43. PubMed ID: 16808571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Over-bite and vertical changes following first premolar extraction in high angle cases.
    Ramesh GC; Pradeep MC; Kumar GA; Girish KS; Suresh BS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):812-8. PubMed ID: 23404008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Masseter muscle thickness in different skeletal morphology: an ultrasonographic study.
    Rani S; Ravi MS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 20930353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients.
    Proff P; Will F; Bokan I; Fanghänel J; Gedrange T
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 18416608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.