179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24326529)
1. Evaluation of stationary colposcope and the Gynocular, by the Swede score systematic colposcopic system in VIA positive women: a crossover randomized trial.
Nessa A; Wistrand C; Begum SA; Thuresson M; Shemer I; Thorsell M; Shemer EA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):339-45. PubMed ID: 24326529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic colposcopic accuracy by the gynocular and a stationary colposcope.
Kallner HK; Persson M; Thuresson M; Altman D; Shemer I; Thorsell M; Shemer EA
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 26063001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting.
Nessa A; Roy JS; Chowdhury MA; Khanam Q; Afroz R; Wistrand C; Thuresson M; Thorsell M; Shemer I; Wikström Shemer EA
BMJ Open; 2014 Nov; 4(11):e005313. PubMed ID: 25366674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement of colposcope and gynocular in assessment of cervical lesions by swede score: a randomized, crossover pilot trial.
Ngonzi J; Bajunirwe F; Wistrand C; Mayanja R; Altman D; Thorsell M; Wikström Shemer EA
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Oct; 17(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 23645068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can portable Colposcopes Replace Standard-of-care Colposcopes? A Crossover Trial of Two Portable Colposcopes with a Standard-of-Care Video Colposcope.
Natarajan J; Mathur S; Vishnubhatla S; Kumar S; Vashist S; Ramanujam N; Singhal S; Meena J; Tanwar P; Bhatla N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Dec; 23(12):4013-4021. PubMed ID: 36579981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of hand-held colposcope (Gynocular) in comparison with standard colposcope in patients with abnormal cervical cytology or visual inspection with acetic acid positivity: a cross over randomized controlled study.
Jayabalan S; Subbaiah M; Chaturvedula L
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2023 Jul; 66(4):300-306. PubMed ID: 37365989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colposcopy telemedicine: live versus static swede score and accuracy in detecting CIN2+, a cross-sectional pilot study.
Taghavi K; Banerjee D; Mandal R; Kallner HK; Thorsell M; Friis T; Kocoska-Maras L; Strander B; Singer A; Wikström E
BMC Womens Health; 2018 Jun; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 29890991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of portable colposcopy and human papillomavirus testing for screening of cervical cancer in rural China.
Newman H; Hu J; Li X; He J; Bradford L; Shan S; Wu X; Zhu B; Yang W; Fu B; Zhu B; Gao G
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jan; 29(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 30640679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of Swede score colposcopy scoring system and histopathological results in patients with high-risk HPV infection other than HPV16 and 18.
Alan M; Gunyeli I; Gultekin M; Sancı M; Yuce K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 31792083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colposcopic findings to study cervical changes in reproductive age group women using various contraceptives.
Bist R; Mohi MK; Garg R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Jun; 309(6):2799-2809. PubMed ID: 38461428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a compact, rechargeable, magnifying device to triage VIA and HPV positive women in a cervical cancer screening program in rural India.
Basu P; Banerjee D; Mittal S; Mandal R; Ghosh I; Das P; Muwonge R; Biswas J
Cancer Causes Control; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1253-9. PubMed ID: 27581249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the AV Magnivisualizer device with colposcopy to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using the Swede scoring system.
Dayal U; Gupta B; Hariprasad R; Shriya R; Rajaram S; Prasad B; Mehrotra R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Nov; 147(2):219-224. PubMed ID: 31353466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Real-world research on cervical cancer screening program and effect evaluation for Chinese population].
Zhao YQ; Dai Y; Dang L; Kong LH; Zhang Y; Feng RM; Qiao YL; Lang JH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 40(10):764-771. PubMed ID: 30392341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.
Canfell K; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Heley S; Brotherton J; Gertig D; Jennett CJ; Farnsworth A; Tan J; Wrede CD; Castle PE; Saville M
PLoS Med; 2017 Sep; 14(9):e1002388. PubMed ID: 28926579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening of cervical neoplasia in HIV-infected women in India.
Joshi S; Sankaranarayanan R; Muwonge R; Kulkarni V; Somanathan T; Divate U
AIDS; 2013 Feb; 27(4):607-15. PubMed ID: 23079814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of careHPV, Cervista Human Papillomavirus, and Hybrid Capture 2 Methods in Diagnosing Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2+ in Xinjiang Uyghur Women.
Tuerxun G; Yukesaier A; Lu L; Aierken K; Mijiti P; Jiang Y; Abulizi A; Zhang Y; Abuduxikuer G; Abulizi G; Li H
Oncologist; 2016 Jul; 21(7):825-31. PubMed ID: 27317575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of a low cost magnifying device, Magnivisualizer, versus colposcope for detection of pre-cancer and cancerous lesions of uterine cervix.
Singh V; Parashari A; Gupta S; Sodhani P; Sehgal A
J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 25142620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
