450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24327552)
1. Presurgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours using mathematical models and scoring systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kaijser J; Sayasneh A; Van Hoorde K; Ghaem-Maghami S; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
Hum Reprod Update; 2014; 20(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 24327552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Menopausal status, ultrasound and biomarker tests in combination for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in symptomatic women.
Davenport C; Rai N; Sharma P; Deeks JJ; Berhane S; Mallett S; Saha P; Champaneria R; Bayliss SE; Snell KI; Sundar S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Jul; 7(7):CD011964. PubMed ID: 35879201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI by operators with varied training.
Sayasneh A; Wynants L; Preisler J; Kaijser J; Johnson S; Stalder C; Husicka R; Abdallah Y; Raslan F; Drought A; Smith AA; Ghaem-Maghami S; Epstein E; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T
Br J Cancer; 2013 Jun; 108(12):2448-54. PubMed ID: 23674083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meys EM; Kaijser J; Kruitwagen RF; Slangen BF; Van Calster B; Aertgeerts B; Verbakel JY; Timmerman D; Van Gorp T
Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 58():17-29. PubMed ID: 26922169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of the IOTA SRR and LR2 scoring systems for discriminating between malignant and Benign Adnexal masses by junior physicians in Chinese patients: a retrospective observational study.
Tian C; Wen SB; Zhao CY; Yan XN; Du JX
BMC Womens Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):585. PubMed ID: 37940895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective evaluation of IOTA logistic regression models LR1 and LR2 in comparison with subjective pattern recognition for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in an outpatient setting.
Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):829-835. PubMed ID: 28976616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should cut-off values of the risk of malignancy index be changed for evaluation of adnexal masses in Asian and Pacific populations?
Yavuzcan A; Caglar M; Ozgu E; Ustun Y; Dilbaz S; Ozdemir I; Yildiz E; Gungor T; Kumru S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(9):5455-9. PubMed ID: 24175841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm versus Risk Malignancy Index-I for Preoperative Assessment of Adnexal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Chacón E; Dasí J; Caballero C; Alcázar JL
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2019; 84(6):591-598. PubMed ID: 31311023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound-based logistic regression model LR2 versus magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective study.
Shimada K; Matsumoto K; Mimura T; Ishikawa T; Munechika J; Ohgiya Y; Kushima M; Hirose Y; Asami Y; Iitsuka C; Miyamoto S; Onuki M; Tsunoda H; Matsuoka R; Ichizuka K; Sekizawa A
Int J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 23(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 29236181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving strategies for diagnosing ovarian cancer: a summary of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) studies.
Kaijser J; Bourne T; Valentin L; Sayasneh A; Van Holsbeke C; Vergote I; Testa AC; Franchi D; Van Calster B; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 41(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 23065859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical Utility of Risk Models to Refer Patients with Adnexal Masses to Specialized Oncology Care: Multicenter External Validation Using Decision Curve Analysis.
Wynants L; Timmerman D; Verbakel JY; Testa A; Savelli L; Fischerova D; Franchi D; Van Holsbeke C; Epstein E; Froyman W; Guerriero S; Rossi A; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Calster B
Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Sep; 23(17):5082-5090. PubMed ID: 28512173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study.
Stukan M; Badocha M; Ratajczak K
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):564. PubMed ID: 31185938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. External validation of diagnostic models to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses.
Van Holsbeke C; Van Calster B; Bourne T; Ajossa S; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Lissoni AA; Czekierdowski A; Savelli L; Van Huffel S; Valentin L; Timmerman D
Clin Cancer Res; 2012 Feb; 18(3):815-25. PubMed ID: 22114135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scoring systems for the evaluation of adnexal masses nature: current knowledge and clinical applications.
Terzic M; Aimagambetova G; Norton M; Della Corte L; Marín-Buck A; Lisón JF; Amer-Cuenca JJ; Zito G; Garzon S; Caruso S; Rapisarda AMC; Cianci A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Apr; 41(3):340-347. PubMed ID: 32347750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
