These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24327666)
1. Satisfaction with cosmesis and priorities for cosmesis design reported by lower limb amputees in the United Kingdom: instrument development and results. Cairns N; Murray K; Corney J; McFadyen A Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):467-73. PubMed ID: 24327666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Satisfaction with cosmesis and priorities for cosmesis design. Wiwanitkit V Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Apr; 39(2):174. PubMed ID: 24519474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The development and internal consistency of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey in active lower limb amputees. Gailey R; Kristal A; Lucarevic J; Harris S; Applegate B; Gaunaurd I Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 30095355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient satisfaction following lower-limb amputation: the role of gait deviation. Kark L; Simmons A Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 21558305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Longitudinal kinematic and kinetic adaptations to obstacle crossing in recent lower limb amputees. Barnett CT; Polman RC; Vanicek N Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):437-46. PubMed ID: 24150931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Prosthetic Limb Sophistication and Amputation Level on Self-reported Mobility and Satisfaction With Mobility. Norvell DC; Henderson AW; Morgenroth DC; Halsne BG; Turner AP; Biggs W; Czerniecki JM Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2024 Jul; 105(7):1338-1345. PubMed ID: 38561145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of prosthetic outcomes between adolescent transtibial and transfemoral amputees after Sichuan earthquake using Step Activity Monitor and Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire. Chu CK; Wong MS Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 25428900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact a surgeon has on primary amputee prosthetic rehabilitation: A survey of residual lower limb quality. Sooriakumaran S; Uden M; Mulroy S; Ewins D; Collins T Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Aug; 42(4):428-436. PubMed ID: 29480094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Delivery of cosmetic covers to persons with transtibial and transfemoral amputations in an outpatient prosthetic practice. Highsmith MJ; Kahle JT; Knight M; Olk-Szost A; Boyd M; Miro RM Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Jun; 40(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 25575552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survey of transfemoral amputee experience and priorities for the user-centered design of powered robotic transfemoral prostheses. Fanciullacci C; McKinney Z; Monaco V; Milandri G; Davalli A; Sacchetti R; Laffranchi M; De Michieli L; Baldoni A; Mazzoni A; PaternĂ² L; Rosini E; Reale L; Trecate F; Crea S; Vitiello N; Gruppioni E J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Dec; 18(1):168. PubMed ID: 34863213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rethinking the foam cosmesis for people with lower limb absence. Cairns N; Corney J; Murray K; Moore-Millar K; Hatcher GD; Zahedi S; Bradbury R; McCarthy J Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Apr; 42(2):223-227. PubMed ID: 28521576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Case study: survey of patient satisfaction with prosthesis quality and design among below-knee prosthetic leg socket users. Mohd Hawari N; Jawaid M; Md Tahir P; Azmeer RA Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):868-874. PubMed ID: 28068847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using a passive microprocessor-controlled knee versus an active powered microprocessor-controlled knee for level walking. Creylman V; Knippels I; Janssen P; Biesbrouck E; Lechler K; Peeraer L Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 3):142. PubMed ID: 28105945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survey of upper limb prosthesis users in Sweden, the United Kingdom and Canada. Kyberd PJ; Hill W Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21697204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The evidence-base for elevated vacuum in lower limb prosthetics: Literature review and professional feedback. Gholizadeh H; Lemaire ED; Eshraghi A Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2016 Aug; 37():108-116. PubMed ID: 27423025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adjustments to amputation and an artificial limb in lower limb amputees. Sinha R; van den Heuvel WJ; Arokiasamy P Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Apr; 38(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 23722600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimated forces and moments experienced by osseointegrated endoprostheses for lower extremity amputees. Taylor CE; Zhang Y; Qiu Y; Henninger HB; Foreman KB; Bachus KN Gait Posture; 2020 Jul; 80():49-55. PubMed ID: 32485424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The functional, spatio-temporal and satisfaction outcomes of transtibial amputees with a hydrocast socket following an extended usage period in an under-resourced environment. Laing S; Lee PVS; Lavranos J; Lythgo N Gait Posture; 2018 Oct; 66():88-93. PubMed ID: 30170139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prosthetic device and service satisfaction, quality of life, and functional performance in lower limb prosthesis clients. DadeMatthews OO; Roper JA; Vazquez A; Shannon DM; Sefton JM Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Aug; 48(4):422-430. PubMed ID: 37870367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]