These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24327813)
1. Effect of 808nm diode laser irradiation on root canal walls after smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscope study. Parirokh M; Eghbal MJ; Asgary S; Ghoddusi J; Stowe S; Forghani F; Shahravan A Iran Endod J; 2007; 2(2):37-42. PubMed ID: 24327813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser. Takeda FH; Harashima T; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K Int Endod J; 1999 Jan; 32(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 10356467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of laser irradiation on root canal walls after final irrigation with 17% EDTA or BioPure MTAD: X-ray diffraction and SEM analysis. Saghiri MA; Asgar K; Gutmann JL; Garcia-Godoy F; Ahmadi K; Karamifar K; Asatorian A Quintessence Int; 2012; 43(10):e127-34. PubMed ID: 23115771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Penetration Depth of Sodium Hypochlorite in Dentinal Tubules after Conventional Irrigation, Passive Ultrasonic Agitation and Nd:YAG Laser Activated Irrigation. Ghorbanzadeh A; Aminsobhani M; Sohrabi K; Chiniforush N; Ghafari S; Shamshiri AR; Noroozi N J Lasers Med Sci; 2016; 7(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 27330706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher file on smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation]. Xin Y; Yang J; Song KY Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 37(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 30854818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Er:YAG 2,940-nm laser fiber in endodontic treatment: a help in removing smear layer. Guidotti R; Merigo E; Fornaini C; Rocca JP; Medioni E; Vescovi P Lasers Med Sci; 2014 Jan; 29(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 23212445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope. Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of Effectiveness of Erbium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser, GentleWave Irradiation, Photodynamic Therapy, and Sodium Hypochlorite in Smear Layer Removal. Dash S; Ismail PM; Singh J; Agwan MA; Ravikumar K; Annadurai T J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1266-1269. PubMed ID: 33850073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of a carbon dioxide laser on periodontally involved root surfaces. Misra V; Mehrotra KK; Dixit J; Maitra SC J Periodontol; 1999 Sep; 70(9):1046-52. PubMed ID: 10505808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effect of different techniques in root canal preparation on coronal microleakage of endodontically treated teeth]. Liu Y; Ma W; Gao W Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 30(5):522-5. PubMed ID: 23173320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Smear layer production by 3 rotary reamers with different cutting blade designs in straight root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study. Jeon IS; Spångberg LS; Yoon TC; Kazemi RB; Kum KY Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Nov; 96(5):601-7. PubMed ID: 14600696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of the effects of 5 irragant combinations on cleaning of anterior straight root canal walls]. Li C; DU R; Zhu YQ Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Jun; 14(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 15995780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of different volumes of EDTA for final rinse on smear layer removal. Mello I; Robazza CR; Antoniazzi JH; Coil J Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):e40-3. PubMed ID: 18718781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of Sodium Hypochlorite Activated With Laser in Intracanal Smear Layer Removal: An SEM Study. Shahriari S; Kasraei S; Roshanaei G; Karkeabadi H; Davanloo H J Lasers Med Sci; 2017; 8(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 28912942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of agitation of EDTA with 808-nanometer diode laser on removal of smear layer. Arslan H; Ayrancı LB; Karatas E; Topçuoğlu HS; Yavuz MS; Kesim B J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1589-92. PubMed ID: 24238453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants. Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study about the removal of smear layer by three types of laser devices. Takeda FH; Harashima T; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K J Clin Laser Med Surg; 1998 Apr; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 9663103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effect of Preparation Size on Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal; A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study. Tabrizizadeh M; Shareghi A Iran Endod J; 2015; 10(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 26213539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of Er:YAG laser irradiation in removing debris and smear layer on root canal walls. Takeda FH; Harashima T; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K J Endod; 1998 Aug; 24(8):548-51. PubMed ID: 9759018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]