BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

846 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24328054)

  • 1. SABRE: ligand/structure-based virtual screening approach using consensus molecular-shape pattern recognition.
    Wei NN; Hamza A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):338-46. PubMed ID: 24328054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficient virtual screening using multiple protein conformations described as negative images of the ligand-binding site.
    Virtanen SI; Pentikäinen OT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 20504004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. LigMatch: a multiple structure-based ligand matching method for 3D virtual screening.
    Kinnings SL; Jackson RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2056-66. PubMed ID: 19685924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using consensus-shape clustering to identify promiscuous ligands and protein targets and to choose the right query for shape-based virtual screening.
    Pérez-Nueno VI; Ritchie DW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jun; 51(6):1233-48. PubMed ID: 21604699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DiSCuS: an open platform for (not only) virtual screening results management.
    Wójcikowski M; Zielenkiewicz P; Siedlecki P
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):347-54. PubMed ID: 24364790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel and efficient ligand-based virtual screening approach using the HWZ scoring function and an enhanced shape-density model.
    Hamza A; Wei NN; Hao C; Xiu Z; Zhan CG
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2013; 31(11):1236-50. PubMed ID: 23140256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SimG: an alignment based method for evaluating the similarity of small molecules and binding sites.
    Cai C; Gong J; Liu X; Gao D; Li H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):2103-15. PubMed ID: 23889471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance evaluation of 2D fingerprint and 3D shape similarity methods in virtual screening.
    Hu G; Kuang G; Xiao W; Li W; Liu G; Tang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1103-13. PubMed ID: 22551340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. LS-align: an atom-level, flexible ligand structural alignment algorithm for high-throughput virtual screening.
    Hu J; Liu Z; Yu DJ; Zhang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):2209-2218. PubMed ID: 29462237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of 3D virtual ligand screening methods: impact of the molecular alignment on enrichment.
    Giganti D; Guillemain H; Spadoni JL; Nilges M; Zagury JF; Montes M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):992-1004. PubMed ID: 20527883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unconventional 2D shape similarity method affords comparable enrichment as a 3D shape method in virtual screening experiments.
    Ebalunode JO; Zheng W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1313-20. PubMed ID: 19480404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comprehensive comparison of ligand-based virtual screening tools against the DUD data set reveals limitations of current 3D methods.
    Venkatraman V; Pérez-Nueno VI; Mavridis L; Ritchie DW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2079-93. PubMed ID: 21090728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Atom pair 2D-fingerprints perceive 3D-molecular shape and pharmacophores for very fast virtual screening of ZINC and GDB-17.
    Awale M; Reymond JL
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):1892-907. PubMed ID: 24988038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FieldScreen: virtual screening using molecular fields. Application to the DUD data set.
    Cheeseright TJ; Mackey MD; Melville JL; Vinter JG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2108-17. PubMed ID: 18991371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. LIGSIFT: an open-source tool for ligand structural alignment and virtual screening.
    Roy A; Skolnick J
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 31(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 25336501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid shape-based ligand alignment and virtual screening method based on atom/feature-pair similarities and volume overlap scoring.
    Sastry GM; Dixon SL; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21870862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ligand-based virtual screening under partial shape constraints.
    von Behren MM; Rarey M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Apr; 31(4):335-347. PubMed ID: 28315995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Boosting virtual screening enrichments with data fusion: coalescing hits from two-dimensional fingerprints, shape, and docking.
    Sastry GM; Inakollu VS; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jul; 53(7):1531-42. PubMed ID: 23782297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.