These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24328442)

  • 1. Contraception at risk.
    The Editors
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Jan; 370(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 24328442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Money, sex, and religion--the Supreme Court's ACA sequel.
    Annas GJ; Ruger TW; Ruger JP
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Aug; 371(9):862-6. PubMed ID: 25029337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Religious freedom and women's health--the litigation on contraception.
    Jost TS
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Jan; 368(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 23252500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The ACA's contraceptive mandate: religious freedom, women's health, and corporate personhood.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2014 Aug; 312(8):785-6. PubMed ID: 25014562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When religious freedom clashes with access to care.
    Cohen IG; Lynch HF; Curfman GD
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Aug; 371(7):596-9. PubMed ID: 24988298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hobby Lobby, corporate law, and the theory of the firm: why for-profit corporations are RFRA persons.
    Meese AJ; Oman NB
    Harv Law Rev; 2014 May; 127(7):273-301. PubMed ID: 25330559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exemption from ACA contraception requirement. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 2014 WL 2921709, (2014).
    Benefits Q; 2014; 30(3):43. PubMed ID: 25509676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The supreme court and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Blumenthal PD; Winikoff B
    MedGenMed; 2007 Jun; 9(2):52. PubMed ID: 17955106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Hyde Amendment at 40 Years and Reproductive Rights in the United States: Perennial and Panoptic.
    Adashi EY; Occhiogrosso Abelman RH
    JAMA; 2017 Apr; 317(15):1523-1524. PubMed ID: 28301642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Substantial Shifts in Supreme Court Health Law Jurisprudence.
    Gostin LO; Hodge JG
    JAMA; 2018 Oct; 320(14):1431-1432. PubMed ID: 30193377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby Case: conscience, complicity, and contraception.
    Charo RA
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Oct; 174(10):1537-8. PubMed ID: 25024087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does religious affiliation affect women's attitudes toward reproductive health policy? Implications for the Affordable Care Act.
    Patton EW; Hall KS; Dalton VK
    Contraception; 2015 Jun; 91(6):513-9. PubMed ID: 25727764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RUNNING MOM AND POP BUSINESSES BY THE GOOD BOOK: THE SCOPE OF RELIGIOUS RIGHTS OF BUSINESS OWNERS.
    Selznick LF
    Albany Law Rev; 2015; 78(4):1353-92. PubMed ID: 27071216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Respecting Religious Freedoms and Protecting the Public's Health.
    Hodge JG
    Public Health Rep; 2015; 130(5):546-9. PubMed ID: 26327735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Supreme Court upholds health care reform: what's next for employer-sponsored group health plans?
    Sciscoe TS; Schaefer SA; Mumford TA
    Health Care Law Mon; 2012 Sep; 2012(9):2-10. PubMed ID: 23045902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Healthcare Reform: Administrative Rulemaking.
    Berry MD;
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2015 Dec; ():1-44. PubMed ID: 27116775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA
    Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. United States Supreme Court Decisions; Affordable Care Act Modification; IRS Determination Letter Program.
    Meadors G
    J Med Pract Manage; 2015; 31(3):165-6. PubMed ID: 26856026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Troubling Court Decision for Reproductive Rights: Legal Recognition of Fetal Standing to Sue.
    Fox D; Adashi EY; Cohen IG
    JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):23-24. PubMed ID: 31116380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.