138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24328574)
21. The glenoid component in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.
Pinkas D; Wiater B; Wiater JM
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2015 May; 23(5):317-26. PubMed ID: 25829449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty glenoid fixation: is there a benefit in using four instead of two screws?
James J; Allison MA; Werner FW; McBride DE; Basu NN; Sutton LG; Nanavati VN
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Aug; 22(8):1030-6. PubMed ID: 23352547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Inferior scapular notching following encore reverse shoulder prosthesis.
Levy J; Blum S
Orthopedics; 2009 Oct; 32(10):. PubMed ID: 19824598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Glenoid loosening in response to dynamic multi-axis eccentric loading: a comparison between keeled and pegged designs with an equivalent radial mismatch.
Roche C; Angibaud L; Flurin PH; Wright T; Zuckerman J
Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 2006; 63(3-4):88-92. PubMed ID: 16878824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of inferior glenoid tilt, humeral retroversion, bone grafting, and design parameters on muscle length and deltoid wrapping in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Roche CP; Diep P; Hamilton M; Crosby LA; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Zuckerman JD; Routman HD
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2013; 71(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 24344621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Improving glenoid-side load sharing in a virtual reverse shoulder arthroplasty model.
Nigro PT; Gutiérrez S; Frankle MA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Jul; 22(7):954-62. PubMed ID: 23313366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessment of glenoid baseplate initial micromotion and fixation strength in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty designs using a direct shear force methodology.
Parr TE; Anderson JK; Marionneaux AM; Tokish JM; Tolan SJ; Hawkins RJ; Kissenberth MJ; DesJardins JD
Shoulder Elbow; 2022 Dec; 14(6):606-614. PubMed ID: 36479005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical impact of posterior glenoid wear on anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
Roche CP; Diep P; Grey SG; Flurin PH
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2013; 71 Suppl 2():S5-11. PubMed ID: 24328573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Does glenoid baseplate geometry affect its fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
James J; Huffman KR; Werner FW; Sutton LG; Nanavati VN
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Jul; 21(7):917-24. PubMed ID: 21778072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of glenoid bone loss on reverse shoulder arthroplasty baseplate fixation.
Formaini NT; Everding NG; Levy JC; Santoni BG; Nayak AN; Wilson C; Cabezas AF
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Nov; 24(11):e312-9. PubMed ID: 26164482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vitro and finite element analysis of glenoid bone/baseplate interaction in the reverse shoulder design.
Virani NA; Harman M; Li K; Levy J; Pupello DR; Frankle MA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2008; 17(3):509-21. PubMed ID: 18328739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of baseplate size on primary glenoid stability and impingement-free range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Chae SW; Kim SY; Lee H; Yon JR; Lee J; Han SH
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Dec; 15():417. PubMed ID: 25488492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Treatment of the Fixation Surface Improves Glenoid Prosthesis Longevity in vitro.
Junaid S; Sanghavi S; Anglin C; Bull A; Emery R; Amis AA; Hansen U
J Biomech; 2017 Aug; 61():81-87. PubMed ID: 28811043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Inferior tilt fixation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A biomechanical study.
Chae SW; Lee J; Han SH; Kim SY
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Jun; 101(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 25907513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reverse glenoid component fixation: is a posterior screw necessary?
Hoenig MP; Loeffler B; Brown S; Peindl R; Fleischli J; Connor P; D'Alessandro D
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2010 Jun; 19(4):544-9. PubMed ID: 20056452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro assessments of reverse glenoid stability using displacement gages are misleading - recommendations for accurate measurements of interface micromotion.
Favre P; Perala S; Vogel P; Fucentese SF; Goff JR; Gerber C; Snedeker JG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Nov; 26(9):917-22. PubMed ID: 21658824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Central fixation element type and length affect glenoid baseplate micromotion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Torkan LF; Bryant JT; Bicknell RT; Ploeg HL
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Jul; 31(7):1385-1392. PubMed ID: 35172207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Finite element analysis and physiologic testing of a novel, inset glenoid fixation technique.
Gunther SB; Lynch TL; O'Farrell D; Calyore C; Rodenhouse A
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Jun; 21(6):795-803. PubMed ID: 22173268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Prosthesis Design Classification System.
Routman HD; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Zuckerman JD; Hamilton MA; Roche CP
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S5-14. PubMed ID: 26631189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of baseplate positioning on fixation of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Zhang M; Junaid S; Gregory T; Hansen U; Cheng CK
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Feb; 62():15-22. PubMed ID: 30658155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
