331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24328762)
1. Improved magnetic resonance myelography of the lumbar spine using image fusion and volumetry.
Eberhardt K; Ganslandt O; Stadlbauer A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 24328762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved magnetic resonance myelography of the cervical spine using image fusion and volumetry.
Eberhardt K; Ganslandt O; Stadlbauer A
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2014 Jul; 75(4):259-66. PubMed ID: 24570306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography?
Kanno H; Endo T; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Itoi E; Ishii Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Myelography using flat panel volumetric computed tomography: a comparative study in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Engelhorn T; Rennert J; Richter G; Struffert T; Ganslandt O; Doerfler A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):E523-7. PubMed ID: 17700433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of lumbar canal stenosis: decubitus imaging methods versus flexion-extension myelography and surface measurements versus the diameter of the dural sac].
Coulier B
JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 10859898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Improved magnetic resonance myelography using image fusion].
Eberhardt K; Ganslandt O; Stadlbauer A
Rofo; 2013 Apr; 185(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 23348124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lumbar spine: quantitative and qualitative assessment of positional (upright flexion and extension) MR imaging and myelography.
Wildermuth S; Zanetti M; Duewell S; Schmid MR; Romanowski B; Benini A; Böni T; Hodler J
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):391-8. PubMed ID: 9577486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
Singh K; Samartzis D; Vaccaro AR; Nassr A; Andersson GB; Yoon ST; Phillips FM; Goldberg EJ; An HS
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic changes in the dural sac of patients with lumbar canal stenosis evaluated by multidetector-row computed tomography after myelography.
Kanbara S; Yukawa Y; Ito K; Machino M; Kato F
Eur Spine J; 2014 Jan; 23(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 23817960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography-myelography for quantitative evaluation of lumbar intracanalar cross-section.
Ogura H; Miyamoto K; Fukuta S; Naganawa T; Shimizu K
Yonsei Med J; 2011 Jan; 52(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 21155046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Functional Myelography.
Morgalla M; Frantz S; Dezena RA; Pereira CU; Tatagiba M
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2018 Jul; 79(4):316-322. PubMed ID: 29346832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional and quantitative magnetic resonance myelography of symptomatic stenoses of the lumbar spine.
Eberhardt K; Ganslandt O; Stadlbauer A
Neuroradiology; 2014 Dec; 56(12):1069-78. PubMed ID: 25245991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the predictive value of myelography, computed tomography and MRI on the treadmill test in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Moon ES; Kim HS; Park JO; Shin DE; Ha JW; Shim DJ; Kwak YH; Lee KI
Yonsei Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 16385657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can recumbent magnetic resonance imaging replace myelography or computed tomography myelography for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis?
Sasaki K; Hasegawa K; Shimoda H; Keiji I; Homma T
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 Jul; 23 Suppl 1():S77-83. PubMed ID: 23542928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The stenosis ratio: a new tool for the diagnosis of degenerative spinal stenosis.
Laurencin CT; Lipson SJ; Senatus P; Botchwey E; Jones TR; Koris M; Hunter J
Int J Surg Investig; 1999; 1(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 11341632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal: axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication.
Willén J; Danielson B; Gaulitz A; Niklason T; Schönström N; Hansson T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Dec; 22(24):2968-76. PubMed ID: 9431634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: a metaanalysis of the accuracy of CT, MR, and myelography.
Kent DL; Haynor DR; Larson EB; Deyo RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 May; 158(5):1135-44. PubMed ID: 1533084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital computed tomography evaluation of spinal canal and dural sac before and after surgical decompression of lumbar stenosis.
Rapała K; Chaberek S; Truszczyńska A; Łukawski S; Walczak P
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2010; 12(2):120-35. PubMed ID: 20453251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [MR myelography in spinal canal stenosis].
Freund M; Hutzelmann A; Steffens JC; Buhl R; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Nov; 167(5):474-8. PubMed ID: 9440892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positionally dependent spinal stenosis: correlation of upright flexion-extension myelography and computed tomographic myelography.
Zander DR; Lander PH
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1998 Aug; 49(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 9709684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
