238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24328928)
1. Generation of intra-oral-like images from cone beam computed tomography volumes for dental forensic image comparison.
Trochesset DA; Serchuk RB; Colosi DC
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Mar; 59(2):510-3. PubMed ID: 24328928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 2D OPG image versus orthopantomogram from 3D CBCT from the forensic point of view.
Eliasova H; Dostalova T; Prochazka A; Sediva E; Horacek M; Urbanova P; Hlinakova P
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2021 Feb; 48():101802. PubMed ID: 33478657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Guidelines for reproducing geometrical aspects of intra-oral radiographs images on cone-beam computed tomography.
Curi JP; Beaini TL; Silva RHAD; Melani RFH; Chilvarquer I; Crosato EM
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Feb; 271():68-74. PubMed ID: 28068573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of dental CBCT software for evaluation of medical CT-acquired images in a multiple fatality incident: Proof of principles.
Wood RE; Gardner T
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Mar; 66(2):737-742. PubMed ID: 33136292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects.
Vandenberghe B; Jacobs R; Yang J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):252-60. PubMed ID: 18606746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metal artifacts from posterior mandibular implants as seen in CBCT.
Naitoh M; Saburi K; Gotoh K; Kurita K; Ariji E
Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 23399788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dental CT imaging as a screening tool for dental profiling: advantages and limitations.
Thali MJ; Markwalder T; Jackowski C; Sonnenschein M; Dirnhofer R
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 16423234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D Multislice and Cone-beam Computed Tomography Systems for Dental Identification.
Eliášová H; Dostálová T
Prague Med Rep; 2017; 118(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 28364571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital imaging methods as an aid in dental identification of human remains.
Bowers CM; Johansen RJ
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Mar; 47(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 11908607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cone-beam imaging in dentistry.
White SC
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):628-37. PubMed ID: 18849696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing dental identifier charting in cone beam computed tomography scans and panoramic radiographs using INTERPOL coding for human identification.
Franco A; Orestes SGF; Coimbra EF; Thevissen P; Fernandes Â
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109860. PubMed ID: 31310942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of digitalized panorama and cone beam computed tomographic image distortion for the diagnosis of dental implant surgery.
Yim JH; Ryu DM; Lee BS; Kwon YD
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):669-73. PubMed ID: 21415634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone beam computed tomography.
Small BW
Gen Dent; 2007; 55(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 17511357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in an orthodontic department in between research and daily clinic.
Cattaneo PM; Melsen B
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 18834009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effective doses in panoramic images from conventional and CBCT equipment.
Batista WO; Navarro MV; Maia AF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 22171097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomography of the jaws for comparative forensic identification: a preliminary study.
Murphy M; Drage N; Carabott R; Adams C
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):964-8. PubMed ID: 22390716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of dental implants in periapical and panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography images: a clinical study.
Felix RP; Shinkai RSA; Rockenbach MIB
Gen Dent; 2018; 66(2):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29513241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
Cattaneo PM; Bloch CB; Calmar D; Hjortshøj M; Melsen B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphometric analysis of mandibular trabecular bone using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
Naitoh M; Aimiya H; Hirukawa A; Ariji E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1093-8. PubMed ID: 21197484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
