These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24328928)

  • 1. Generation of intra-oral-like images from cone beam computed tomography volumes for dental forensic image comparison.
    Trochesset DA; Serchuk RB; Colosi DC
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Mar; 59(2):510-3. PubMed ID: 24328928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 2D OPG image versus orthopantomogram from 3D CBCT from the forensic point of view.
    Eliasova H; Dostalova T; Prochazka A; Sediva E; Horacek M; Urbanova P; Hlinakova P
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2021 Feb; 48():101802. PubMed ID: 33478657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
    Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidelines for reproducing geometrical aspects of intra-oral radiographs images on cone-beam computed tomography.
    Curi JP; Beaini TL; Silva RHAD; Melani RFH; Chilvarquer I; Crosato EM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Feb; 271():68-74. PubMed ID: 28068573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of dental CBCT software for evaluation of medical CT-acquired images in a multiple fatality incident: Proof of principles.
    Wood RE; Gardner T
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Mar; 66(2):737-742. PubMed ID: 33136292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects.
    Vandenberghe B; Jacobs R; Yang J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):252-60. PubMed ID: 18606746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metal artifacts from posterior mandibular implants as seen in CBCT.
    Naitoh M; Saburi K; Gotoh K; Kurita K; Ariji E
    Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 23399788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental CT imaging as a screening tool for dental profiling: advantages and limitations.
    Thali MJ; Markwalder T; Jackowski C; Sonnenschein M; Dirnhofer R
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 16423234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D Multislice and Cone-beam Computed Tomography Systems for Dental Identification.
    Eliášová H; Dostálová T
    Prague Med Rep; 2017; 118(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 28364571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital imaging methods as an aid in dental identification of human remains.
    Bowers CM; Johansen RJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Mar; 47(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 11908607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cone-beam imaging in dentistry.
    White SC
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):628-37. PubMed ID: 18849696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing dental identifier charting in cone beam computed tomography scans and panoramic radiographs using INTERPOL coding for human identification.
    Franco A; Orestes SGF; Coimbra EF; Thevissen P; Fernandes Â
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109860. PubMed ID: 31310942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of digitalized panorama and cone beam computed tomographic image distortion for the diagnosis of dental implant surgery.
    Yim JH; Ryu DM; Lee BS; Kwon YD
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):669-73. PubMed ID: 21415634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cone beam computed tomography.
    Small BW
    Gen Dent; 2007; 55(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 17511357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in an orthodontic department in between research and daily clinic.
    Cattaneo PM; Melsen B
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 18834009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective doses in panoramic images from conventional and CBCT equipment.
    Batista WO; Navarro MV; Maia AF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 22171097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomography of the jaws for comparative forensic identification: a preliminary study.
    Murphy M; Drage N; Carabott R; Adams C
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):964-8. PubMed ID: 22390716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of dental implants in periapical and panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography images: a clinical study.
    Felix RP; Shinkai RSA; Rockenbach MIB
    Gen Dent; 2018; 66(2):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29513241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
    Cattaneo PM; Bloch CB; Calmar D; Hjortshøj M; Melsen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morphometric analysis of mandibular trabecular bone using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Naitoh M; Aimiya H; Hirukawa A; Ariji E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1093-8. PubMed ID: 21197484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.