These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24329491)

  • 1. User-operated speech in noise test: implementation and comparison with a traditional test.
    Pedersen ER; Juhl PM
    Int J Audiol; 2014 May; 53(5):336-44. PubMed ID: 24329491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech-in-noise tests for multilingual hearing screening and diagnostics1.
    Zokoll MA; Hochmuth S; Warzybok A; Wagener KC; Buschermöhle M; Kollmeier B
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):175-8. PubMed ID: 23800814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners.
    Duquesnoy AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1136-44. PubMed ID: 6643835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
    Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
    Hochmuth S; Brand T; Zokoll MA; Castro FZ; Wardenga N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech audiometry in Estonia: Estonian words in noise (EWIN) test.
    Veispak A; Jansen S; Ghesquière P; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Aug; 54(8):573-8. PubMed ID: 25812043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of an internet-based speech-in-noise screening test for school-age children.
    Sheikh Rashid M; Dreschler WA; de Laat JAPM
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):967-975. PubMed ID: 28936876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The French digit triplet test: a hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise.
    Jansen S; Luts H; Wagener KC; Frachet B; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 May; 49(5):378-87. PubMed ID: 20380611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Characteristics, advantages, and limits of matrix tests].
    Brand T; Wagener KC
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):182-188. PubMed ID: 27538937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use.
    MacLeod A; Summerfield Q
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Feb; 24(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 2317599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.