462 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24329756)
1. The current use of Impella 2.5 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the USpella Registry.
O'Neill WW; Schreiber T; Wohns DH; Rihal C; Naidu SS; Civitello AB; Dixon SR; Massaro JM; Maini B; Ohman EM
J Interv Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 27(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 24329756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early Impella Support in Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Improves Short- and Long-Term Survival.
Chatzis G; Markus B; Luesebrink U; Ahrens H; Divchev D; Syntila S; Scheele N; Al Eryani H; Tousoulis D; Schieffer B; Karatolios K
Crit Care Med; 2021 Jun; 49(6):943-955. PubMed ID: 33729726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Women With Cardiogenic Shock Derive Greater Benefit From Early Mechanical Circulatory Support: An Update From the cVAD Registry.
Joseph SM; Brisco MA; Colvin M; Grady KL; Walsh MN; Cook JL;
J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Jun; 29(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 27229327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long term survival after early unloading with Impella CP
Loehn T; O'Neill WW; Lange B; Pfluecke C; Schweigler T; Mierke J; Waessnig N; Mahlmann A; Youssef A; Speiser U; Strasser RH; Ibrahim K
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):149-157. PubMed ID: 30456984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impella 2.5 initiated prior to unprotected left main PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock improves early survival.
Meraj PM; Doshi R; Schreiber T; Maini B; O'Neill WW
J Interv Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 30(3):256-263. PubMed ID: 28419573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pre-PCI versus immediate post-PCI Impella initiation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Hemradj VV; Karami M; Sjauw KD; Engström AE; Ouweneel DM; de Brabander J; Vis MM; Wykrzykowska JJ; Beijk MA; Koch KT; Baan J; de Winter RJ; Piek JJ; Driessen AHG; Lagrand WK; Vlaar APJ; Ottervanger JP; Henriques JPS
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235762. PubMed ID: 32687502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Left Ventricular Unloading Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Miyashita S; Banlengchit R; Marbach JA; Chweich H; Kawabori M; Kimmelstiel CD; Kapur NK
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jun; 39():28-35. PubMed ID: 34824038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization.
Tarantini G; Masiero G; Burzotta F; Pazzanese V; Briguori C; Trani C; Piva T; De Marco F; Di Biasi M; Pagnotta P; Mojoli M; Casu G; Giustino G; Lorenzoni G; Montorfano M; Ancona MB; Pappalardo F; Chieffo A;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Aug; 98(2):E222-E234. PubMed ID: 33793051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of Hemodynamic Support With Impella for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock at a Rural Community Hospital Without On-Site Surgical Back-up.
Wilkins CE; Herrera TL; Nagahiro MK; Weathers LB; Girotra SV; Sandhu F
J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 31(2):E23-E29. PubMed ID: 30700627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group.
Doshi R; Patel K; Decter D; Jauhar R; Meraj P
Indian Heart J; 2018 Jul; 70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90-S95. PubMed ID: 30122245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes Between the Use of Impella and IABP in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Jin C; Yandrapalli S; Yang Y; Liu B; Aronow WS; Naidu SS
J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E98-E103. PubMed ID: 35100554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of different mechanical circulatory support devices and their timing of implantation on myocardial damage and mid-term recovery in acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock.
Pieri M; Sorrentino T; Oppizzi M; Melisurgo G; Lembo R; Colombo A; Zangrillo A; Pappalardo F
J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 30460719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D
Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Healthcare Resource Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Impella Versus Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Use for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights From National Inpatient Sample.
Dodoo SN; Kwapong YA; Agyemang-Sarpong A; Amoran E; Egolum UO; Ghasemzadeh N; Ramadan R; Henry G; Samady H
Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 49(1 Pt A):102053. PubMed ID: 37640173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical features and outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: early vs recent experience with impella.
Singh H; Mehta RH; O'Neill W; Kapur NK; Lalonde T; Ohman M; Ghiu I; Chen-Hsing Y; Dutcheshen K; Schreiber T; Rosman H; Kaki A
Am Heart J; 2021 Aug; 238():66-74. PubMed ID: 33848505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the CathPCI Registry.
Wayangankar SA; Bangalore S; McCoy LA; Jneid H; Latif F; Karrowni W; Charitakis K; Feldman DN; Dakik HA; Mauri L; Peterson ED; Messenger J; Roe M; Mukherjee D; Klein A
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 9(4):341-351. PubMed ID: 26803418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of Impella 2.5 in severe refractory cardiogenic shock complicating an acute myocardial infarction.
Casassus F; Corre J; Leroux L; Chevalereau P; Fresselinat A; Seguy B; Calderon J; Coste P; Ouattara A; Roques X; Barandon L
J Interv Cardiol; 2015 Feb; 28(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 25689547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Timing of impella placement in PCI for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: An updated meta-analysis.
Iannaccone M; Franchin L; Hanson ID; Boccuzzi G; Basir MB; Truesdell AG; O'Neill W
Int J Cardiol; 2022 Sep; 362():47-54. PubMed ID: 35533755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
