214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24329999)
1. Long pacing pulses reduce phrenic nerve stimulation in left ventricular pacing.
Hjortshøj S; Heath F; Haugland M; Eschen O; Thøgersen AM; Riahi S; Toft E; Struijk JJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 May; 25(5):485-490. PubMed ID: 24329999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical efficacy of left ventricular pacing vector programmability in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator patients for management of phrenic nerve stimulation and/or elevated left ventricular pacing thresholds: insights from the Efface Phrenic Stim study.
Klein N; Klein M; Weglage H; Przibille O; Fischer S; Trappe HJ; Birkenhauer F; Pfeiffer D;
Europace; 2012 Jun; 14(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 22277645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multipolar pacing by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillators treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus failing heart patients: impact on responders rate, and clinical outcomes.
Sardu C; Barbieri M; Santamaria M; Giordano V; Sacra C; Paolisso P; Spirito A; Marfella R; Paolisso G; Rizzo MR
Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2017 Jun; 16(1):75. PubMed ID: 28599667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Left ventricular pacing with long pulse duration can avoid phrenic nerve stimulation.
Oh S; Kim WY; Kim HC; Oh IY; Choi EK
Heart Rhythm; 2011 Oct; 8(10):1637-40. PubMed ID: 21699844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivered Via a Multipolar Left Ventricular Lead is Associated with Reduced Mortality and Elimination of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation: Long-Term Follow-Up from a Multicenter Registry.
Behar JM; Bostock J; Zhu Li AP; Chin HM; Jubb S; Lent E; Gamble J; Foley PW; Betts TR; Rinaldi CA; Herring N
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 May; 26(5):540-6. PubMed ID: 25631303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of electronic repositioning on left ventricular pacing and phrenic nerve stimulation.
Champagne J; Healey JS; Krahn AD; Philippon F; Gurevitz O; Swearingen A; Glikson M;
Europace; 2011 Mar; 13(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 21273196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of Anatomically Designed Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads: Results from the NAVIGATE X4 Clinical Trial.
Mittal S; Nair D; Padanilam BJ; Ciuffo A; Gupta N; Gallagher P; Goldner B; Hammill EF; Wold N; Stein K; Burke M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1199-1205. PubMed ID: 27434039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of bipolar electrode spacing on phrenic nerve stimulation and left ventricular pacing thresholds: an acute canine study.
Biffi M; Foerster L; Eastman W; Eggen M; Grenz NA; Sommer J; De Santo T; Haddad T; Varbaro A; Yang Z
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2012 Aug; 5(4):815-20. PubMed ID: 22787012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Left ventricular lead implantation at a phrenic stimulation site is safe and effective.
Jastrzebski M; Bacior B; Wojciechowska W; Czarnecka D
Europace; 2011 Apr; 13(4):520-5. PubMed ID: 21242156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implantation feasibility, procedure-related adverse events and lead performance during 1-year follow-up in patients undergoing triple-site cardiac resynchronization therapy: a substudy of TRUST CRT randomized trial.
Lenarczyk R; Kowalski O; Sredniawa B; Pruszkowska-Skrzep P; Mazurek M; Jędrzejczyk-Patej E; Woźniak A; Pluta S; Głowacki J; Kalarus Z
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1228-36. PubMed ID: 22651239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postoperative performance of the Quartet® left ventricular heart lead.
Tomassoni G; Baker J; Corbisiero R; Love C; Martin D; Niazi I; Sheppard R; Worley S; Beau S; Greer GS; Aryana A; Cao M; Harbert N; Zhang S;
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 23339555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pacing and sensing optimization of permanent His-bundle pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy/implantable cardioverter defibrillators patients: value of integrated bipolar configuration.
Su L; Xu L; Wu SJ; Huang WJ
Europace; 2016 Sep; 18(9):1399-405. PubMed ID: 26581403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness and Reliability of Selected Site Pacing for Avoidance of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in CRT Patients with Quadripolar LV Leads: The EffaceQ Study.
Oswald H; Asbach S; Köbe J; Weglage H; Schulte-Pitzke B; Brachmann J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 38(8):942-50. PubMed ID: 25974406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of different pacing strategies to minimize phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Huizar JF; Kaszala K; Koneru JN; Thacker LR; Ellenbogen KA
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1008-14. PubMed ID: 23621543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: extending current responses to phrenic nerve stimulation.
Weinstock J; Estes NAM
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 May; 25(5):491-493. PubMed ID: 24405146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Short-spaced dipole for managing phrenic nerve stimulation in patients with CRT: the "phrenic nerve mapping and stimulation EP" catheter study.
Biffi M; Zanon F; Bertaglia E; Padeletti L; Varbaro A; De Santo T; Boriani G; Yang Z;
Heart Rhythm; 2013 Jan; 10(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 23063865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The roles of the Q (q) wave in lead I and QRS frontal axis for diagnosing loss of left ventricular capture during cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Cao YY; Su YG; Bai J; Wang W; Wang JF; Qin SM; Ge JB
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 25112169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with right ventricular sense triggered left ventricular pacing benefits for the hemodynamics compared with standard CRT for chronic congestive heart failure: A cross-over study.
Pu LJ; Wang Y; Zhao L; Luo ZL; Hua BT; Han MH; Li SM; Yang J; Li L; Peng YZ; Guo T
Cardiol J; 2015; 22(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 25179313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized double-blind comparison of biventricular versus left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Biventricular versus Left Univentricular Pacing with ICD Back-up in Heart Failure Patients (B-LEFT HF) trial.
Boriani G; Kranig W; Donal E; Calo L; Casella M; Delarche N; Lozano IF; Ansalone G; Biffi M; Boulogne E; Leclercq C;
Am Heart J; 2010 Jun; 159(6):1052-1058.e1. PubMed ID: 20569719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal pacing for right ventricular and biventricular devices: minimizing, maximizing, and right ventricular/left ventricular site considerations.
Gillis AM
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Oct; 7(5):968-77. PubMed ID: 25336367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
